Template:Novel motif: Difference between revisions
From FANTOM5_SSTAR
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
$('#h_pval_table').DataTable({ | $('#h_pval_table').DataTable({ | ||
dom: 'lfrtip', | dom: 'lfrtip', | ||
scrollY: "300px", | |||
scrollCollapse: true, | |||
searching: true, | searching: true, | ||
pLength: 10, | pLength: 10, | ||
| Line 64: | Line 66: | ||
dom: 'Blfrtip', | dom: 'Blfrtip', | ||
buttons: ['copyHtml5', 'excelHtml5', 'csvHtml5', 'pdfHtml5'], | buttons: ['copyHtml5', 'excelHtml5', 'csvHtml5', 'pdfHtml5'], | ||
scrollY: "300px", | |||
scrollCollapse: true, | |||
pageLength: 10, | pageLength: 10, | ||
lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]], | lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]], | ||
| Line 84: | Line 88: | ||
$('#great_table_human').DataTable({ | $('#great_table_human').DataTable({ | ||
dom: 'lfrtip', | dom: 'lfrtip', | ||
scrollY: "300px", | |||
scrollCollapse: true, | |||
pageLength: 10, | pageLength: 10, | ||
lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]], | lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]], | ||
| Line 102: | Line 108: | ||
$('#great_table_mouse').DataTable({ | $('#great_table_mouse').DataTable({ | ||
dom: 'lfrtip', | dom: 'lfrtip', | ||
scrollY: "300px", | |||
scrollCollapse: true, | |||
pageLength: 10, | pageLength: 10, | ||
lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]], | lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]], | ||
Revision as of 15:53, 17 January 2020
| name: | {{{name}}} |
|---|
Association to promoter expression in human samples<b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, human <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data
Association to promoter expression in mouse samples
<b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, mouse <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data
GREAT analysis results for human
<b>Summary:</b>Genomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data
| GO ID | GO Term | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| {{{great_results_human}}} |
GREAT analysis results for mouseGenomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source dataset <br>data
| GO ID | GO Term | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| {{{great_results_mouse}}} |
