Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1988

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:45, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:74739380..74739411,+p2@Smg6
Mm9::chr15:96117187..96117198,+p@chr15:96117187..96117198
+
Mm9::chr18:31963738..31963774,+p1@Wdr33
Mm9::chr6:146526278..146526321,-p1@4933424B01Rik


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0000184mRNA catabolic process, nonsense-mediated decay0.0367846010416884
GO:0000781chromosome, telomeric region0.0367846010416884
GO:0006402mRNA catabolic process0.0367846010416884
GO:0006401RNA catabolic process0.0367846010416884



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphocyte3.50e-0713
common lymphoid progenitor3.50e-0713
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.95e-0712

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemopoietic organ9.51e-1229
immune organ9.51e-1229
thymus2.33e-1123
neck2.33e-1123
respiratory system epithelium2.33e-1123
hemolymphoid system gland2.33e-1123
pharyngeal epithelium2.33e-1123
thymic region2.33e-1123
pharyngeal gland2.33e-1123
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.33e-1123
thymus primordium2.33e-1123
early pharyngeal endoderm2.33e-1123
gland of gut6.90e-1124
pharynx1.64e-1024
upper respiratory tract1.64e-1024
chordate pharynx1.64e-1024
pharyngeal arch system1.64e-1024
pharyngeal region of foregut1.64e-1024
anterior region of body2.30e-1043
craniocervical region6.49e-1036
respiratory tract1.22e-0941
respiratory system2.09e-0942
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure2.29e-0935
hematopoietic system2.05e-0845
blood island2.05e-0845
segment of respiratory tract7.35e-0827
hemolymphoid system1.19e-0748
immune system1.19e-0748
primordium1.51e-07134


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}