Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1267

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:39, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:102856319..102856355,-p@chr11:102856319..102856355
-
Mm9::chr11:102878387..102878466,-p1@Dcakd
Mm9::chr11:102878481..102878493,-p3@Dcakd
Mm9::chr19:4615647..4615700,-p2@Lrfn4
Mm9::chr4:128483534..128483613,-p1@Zfp362
Mm9::chr4:128483731..128483757,-p4@Zfp362


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004140dephospho-CoA kinase activity0.00482099322332118



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
ectodermal cell3.94e-1144
neurectodermal cell3.94e-1144
neural cell4.39e-1143
neuron1.47e-0933
neuronal stem cell1.47e-0933
neuroblast1.47e-0933
electrically signaling cell1.47e-0933
non-terminally differentiated cell3.43e-0949
electrically responsive cell1.41e-0739
electrically active cell1.41e-0739

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-cellular organism2.56e-08333
central nervous system4.90e-0873
ectoderm-derived structure5.25e-0895
ectoderm5.25e-0895
presumptive ectoderm5.25e-0895
nervous system1.25e-0775
embryo2.17e-07320


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}