Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:542

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:31, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr14:56223010..56223067,+p1@Irf9
Mm9::chr16:35939027..35939065,-p3@Dtx3l
Mm9::chr1:52176315..52176343,+p1@Stat1
Mm9::chr1:58768332..58768367,+p2@Cflar
Mm9::chr3:89534657..89534708,+p2@Adar
Mm9::chr4:40186812..40186864,-p1@Ddx58
Mm9::chr5:137592047..137592089,-p1@Trim56
Mm9::chr5:36924464..36924494,-p4@Tbc1d14
Mm9::chr7:109713939..109713988,-p1@Trim21
Mm9::chr7:111501842..111501908,-p1@LOC675296
p1@Trim12c
Mm9::chr7:17428245..17428303,+p1@Prkd2
Mm9::chr8:47825107..47825145,+p1@Irf2
Mm9::chr8:64406878..64406891,+p2@Ddx60
Mm9::chr9:107877860..107877932,+p1@Uba7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure2.19e-17118
endoderm2.19e-17118
presumptive endoderm2.19e-17118
digestive system5.56e-17116
digestive tract5.56e-17116
primitive gut5.56e-17116
subdivision of digestive tract1.93e-16114
hemolymphoid system8.38e-1148
immune system8.38e-1148
endo-epithelium2.75e-1069
unilaminar epithelium5.50e-1066
hematopoietic system8.46e-1045
blood island8.46e-1045
gut epithelium6.12e-0955
foregut7.36e-0980
gastrointestinal system7.55e-0847
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure7.73e-0835
lateral plate mesoderm2.39e-0787
organ component layer3.88e-0724
intestine5.27e-0731
hemopoietic organ8.10e-0729
immune organ8.10e-0729


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}