Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1071

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:50, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1071_renal_serous_Olfactory_clear_mesothelioma_Fibroblast_mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:9049682..9049710,+p3@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9049723..9049741,+p2@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9049742..9049765,+p5@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9049766..9049777,+p9@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9049782..9049807,+p6@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9077899..9077903,+p@chr20:9077899..9077903
+
Hg19::chr20:9079545..9079556,+p@chr20:9079545..9079556
+
Hg19::chr20:9172019..9172022,+p@chr20:9172019..9172022
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
skin fibroblast5.00e-0723
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.72e-17115
organism subdivision3.05e-16365
ectoderm-derived structure1.68e-15169
multi-tissue structure2.51e-15347
ectoderm4.18e-15173
presumptive ectoderm4.18e-15173
anterior region of body1.45e-13129
craniocervical region1.45e-13129
head3.02e-13123
regional part of nervous system3.70e-1394
nervous system3.70e-1394
central nervous system6.62e-1382
organ1.24e-12511
neural tube4.58e-1257
neural rod4.58e-1257
future spinal cord4.58e-1257
neural keel4.58e-1257
organ part1.10e-11219
regional part of brain3.05e-1159
anatomical cluster8.03e-11286
brain1.02e-1069
future brain1.02e-1069
multi-cellular organism6.53e-10659
neural plate1.19e-0986
presumptive neural plate1.19e-0986
neurectoderm3.51e-0990
anatomical system2.17e-08625
anatomical group3.23e-08626
surface structure5.92e-0895
anterior neural tube5.93e-0842
regional part of forebrain8.51e-0841
forebrain8.51e-0841
future forebrain8.51e-0841
skin of body2.30e-0740


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.