Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:963

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:13, 10 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{MCL_coexpression_mm9|gostat_on_MCL_coexpression=GO:0005923;tight junction;0.00246194977465085;224912,12739!GO:0043296;apical junction complex;0.00246194977465085;224912,1273...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr15:75760163..75760202,-p1@Tsta3
Mm9::chr17:57201683..57201738,+p1@Crb3
Mm9::chr4:135519657..135519675,+p1@Gale
Mm9::chr5:135461886..135461903,+p3@Cldn3
Mm9::chr5:135462061..135462140,+p1@Cldn3
Mm9::chr5:135462146..135462162,+p4@Cldn3
Mm9::chr5:135462172..135462193,+p2@Cldn3
Mm9::chr7:4741143..4741216,-p1@2210411K11Rik


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005923tight junction0.00246194977465085
GO:0043296apical junction complex0.00246194977465085
GO:0016327apicolateral plasma membrane0.00246194977465085
GO:0050577GDP-L-fucose synthase activity0.00246194977465085
GO:0003978UDP-glucose 4-epimerase activity0.00246194977465085
GO:0050662coenzyme binding0.00246194977465085
GO:0005911intercellular junction0.00316853207102322
GO:0016853isomerase activity0.00316853207102322
GO:0048037cofactor binding0.00343874979263409
GO:0045198establishment of epithelial cell polarity0.00543338323525149
GO:0006012galactose metabolic process0.00565930905470452
GO:0030859polarized epithelial cell differentiation0.00565930905470452
GO:0035089establishment of apical/basal cell polarity0.00582052519543573
GO:0016338calcium-independent cell-cell adhesion0.00582052519543573
GO:0016857racemase and epimerase activity, acting on carbohydrates and derivatives0.00594129780225743
GO:0045197establishment and/or maintenance of epithelial cell polarity0.00594129780225743
GO:0045216intercellular junction assembly and maintenance0.00639011442359807
GO:0009225nucleotide-sugar metabolic process0.00740428882746588
GO:0001738morphogenesis of a polarized epithelium0.00740428882746588
GO:0035088establishment and/or maintenance of apical/basal cell polarity0.00740428882746588
GO:0030054cell junction0.00740428882746588
GO:0016854racemase and epimerase activity0.00740428882746588
GO:0030010establishment of cell polarity0.00767192954625124
GO:0007028cytoplasm organization and biogenesis0.00961134086558938
GO:0007163establishment and/or maintenance of cell polarity0.0130187005868609
GO:0030855epithelial cell differentiation0.0187584578422186
GO:0016324apical plasma membrane0.0245604382893872
GO:0045177apical part of cell0.0371309899944031



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:



"{{{coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median}}}" is not a number.

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}