Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4649

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:45, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4649_H9_iPS_HES3GFP_Hepatocyte_mature_heart_anaplastic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:121738923..121738927,-p@chr7:121738923..121738927
-
Hg19::chr7:121784265..121784276,-p2@AASS
Hg19::chr7:121784285..121784350,-p1@AASS


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
non-terminally differentiated cell5.10e-07180
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism9.27e-22115
regional part of nervous system7.91e-1994
nervous system7.91e-1994
central nervous system1.27e-1782
ectoderm1.89e-16173
presumptive ectoderm1.89e-16173
neural tube2.04e-1557
neural rod2.04e-1557
future spinal cord2.04e-1557
neural keel2.04e-1557
ectoderm-derived structure5.40e-15169
neurectoderm7.51e-1590
brain2.86e-1469
future brain2.86e-1469
regional part of brain3.27e-1459
neural plate3.12e-1386
presumptive neural plate3.12e-1386
head1.25e-12123
organism subdivision2.41e-12365
regional part of forebrain2.68e-1241
forebrain2.68e-1241
future forebrain2.68e-1241
anterior neural tube2.70e-1242
anterior region of body4.81e-12129
craniocervical region4.81e-12129
anatomical conduit3.50e-10241
gray matter5.66e-1034
brain grey matter5.66e-1034
multi-cellular organism9.60e-10659
pre-chordal neural plate1.35e-0961
telencephalon1.43e-0934
regional part of telencephalon1.52e-0933
anatomical cluster2.30e-09286
cerebral hemisphere1.29e-0832
epithelium2.07e-08309
cell layer2.76e-08312
multi-tissue structure3.21e-08347
tube3.68e-08194


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOXA2#3170216.42030916844350.004810682352105480.0226011180464033
HNF4A#3172215.42152690863580.005444210486686610.0246922264740983
HNF4G#3174219.16894835096450.003543986611284220.0179805886663062
NFYA#4800212.28372046655370.008516011403724430.0324979434008176
NFYB#4801211.17319550235760.01025467135054530.0381609699333546
NR3C1#290829.982015554115360.01278474365547170.0460772255722897



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.