Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1393

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:49, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr17:25014779..25014820,+p3@Igfals
Mm9::chr17:35018949..35019025,-p1@C2
Mm9::chr1:90303577..90303676,+p1@Spp2
Mm9::chr4:140176569..140176599,-p@chr4:140176569..140176599
-
Mm9::chr6:72306203..72306215,+p@chr6:72306203..72306215
+
Mm9::chr6:72306226..72306250,+p@chr6:72306226..72306250
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
liver6.81e-1922
epithelial sac6.81e-1922
digestive gland6.81e-1922
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction6.81e-1922
anatomical boundary6.81e-1922
hepatobiliary system6.81e-1922
foregut-midgut junction6.81e-1922
hepatic diverticulum6.81e-1922
liver primordium6.81e-1922
septum transversum6.81e-1922
liver bud6.81e-1922
digestive tract diverticulum1.26e-1723
sac1.26e-1723
abdomen element4.46e-1749
abdominal segment element4.46e-1749
abdominal segment of trunk4.46e-1749
abdomen4.46e-1749
exocrine gland2.06e-1525
exocrine system2.06e-1525
mesenchyme8.17e-1361
entire embryonic mesenchyme8.17e-1361
trunk mesenchyme2.28e-1145
trunk region element5.41e-1079
epithelial tube1.94e-0947
subdivision of trunk5.00e-0966
trunk2.48e-0890


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}