Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2823

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:05, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr13:19282202..19282218,+p1@uc011ywm.1
Mm9::chr14:54694573..54694620,+p1@ENSMUST00000103679
Mm9::chr14:54694662..54694674,+p2@ENSMUST00000103679


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
digestive system4.11e-12116
digestive tract4.11e-12116
primitive gut4.11e-12116
endoderm-derived structure1.29e-11118
endoderm1.29e-11118
presumptive endoderm1.29e-11118
respiratory system3.76e-1142
subdivision of digestive tract5.06e-11114
respiratory tract2.03e-1041
hemopoietic organ2.87e-0929
immune organ2.87e-0929
foregut3.16e-0980
gland of gut3.68e-0924
pharynx7.98e-0924
upper respiratory tract7.98e-0924
chordate pharynx7.98e-0924
pharyngeal arch system7.98e-0924
pharyngeal region of foregut7.98e-0924
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure1.16e-0835
thymus2.22e-0823
neck2.22e-0823
respiratory system epithelium2.22e-0823
hemolymphoid system gland2.22e-0823
pharyngeal epithelium2.22e-0823
thymic region2.22e-0823
pharyngeal gland2.22e-0823
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.22e-0823
thymus primordium2.22e-0823
early pharyngeal endoderm2.22e-0823
segment of respiratory tract3.02e-0727


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}