Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3180

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:39, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr19:24748488..24748507,+p1@E030010A14Rik
Mm9::chrX:159402160..159402169,-p@chrX:159402160..159402169
-
Mm9::chrX:159402489..159402508,-p1@S100g


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005499vitamin D binding0.00788846576894062
GO:0005496steroid binding0.0303098536880971
GO:0016324apical plasma membrane0.0303098536880971
GO:0016323basolateral plasma membrane0.0303098536880971
GO:0045177apical part of cell0.0303098536880971
GO:0019842vitamin binding0.0344165412921234



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
intestine2.23e-1631
gastrointestinal system7.38e-1247
mucosa9.88e-0915
endoderm-derived structure7.73e-08118
endoderm7.73e-08118
presumptive endoderm7.73e-08118
intestinal mucosa1.19e-0713
anatomical wall1.19e-0713
wall of intestine1.19e-0713
gastrointestinal system mucosa1.19e-0713
renal system2.03e-0719
urinary system structure2.70e-0718
digestive system3.79e-07116
digestive tract3.79e-07116
primitive gut3.79e-07116
kidney5.46e-0714
kidney mesenchyme5.46e-0714
upper urinary tract5.46e-0714
kidney rudiment5.46e-0714
kidney field5.46e-0714


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}