Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C920

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:33, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C920_anaplastic_adult_hereditary_cord_hairy_immature_xeroderma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:53535935..53535939,+p@chr17:53535935..53535939
+
Hg19::chr17:80317121..80317128,+p1@TEX19
Hg19::chr1:12123219..12123228,+p6@TNFRSF8
Hg19::chr1:12123317..12123328,+p8@TNFRSF8
Hg19::chr1:12123343..12123367,+p1@TNFRSF8
Hg19::chr1:12123379..12123405,+p2@TNFRSF8
Hg19::chr1:12123414..12123445,+p3@TNFRSF8
Hg19::chr1:12124073..12124086,+p@chr1:12124073..12124086
+
Hg19::chr5:129083784..129083814,+p1@KIAA1024L


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0045554regulation of TRAIL biosynthetic process0.000551925114800424
GO:0032639TRAIL production0.000551925114800424
GO:0045556positive regulation of TRAIL biosynthetic process0.000551925114800424
GO:0045553TRAIL biosynthetic process0.000551925114800424
GO:0042535positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor biosynthetic process0.00220770045920169
GO:0042533tumor necrosis factor biosynthetic process0.00252308623908765
GO:0042534regulation of tumor necrosis factor biosynthetic process0.00252308623908765
GO:0032640tumor necrosis factor production0.00358751324620275
GO:0042108positive regulation of cytokine biosynthetic process0.0100573020919188
GO:0045727positive regulation of translation0.0103026021429412
GO:0042035regulation of cytokine biosynthetic process0.0103026021429412
GO:0031328positive regulation of cellular biosynthetic process0.0103026021429412
GO:0042089cytokine biosynthetic process0.0103026021429412
GO:0042107cytokine metabolic process0.0103026021429412
GO:0009891positive regulation of biosynthetic process0.0103026021429412
GO:0051247positive regulation of protein metabolic process0.011728408689509
GO:0001816cytokine production0.0146747148170466
GO:0006417regulation of translation0.0225676046940618
GO:0031326regulation of cellular biosynthetic process0.0231227574411125
GO:0009889regulation of biosynthetic process0.0236539334914467
GO:0008285negative regulation of cell proliferation0.0236539334914467
GO:0043065positive regulation of apoptosis0.0247646399336538
GO:0043068positive regulation of programmed cell death0.0247646399336538
GO:0031325positive regulation of cellular metabolic process0.0335754444836924
GO:0009893positive regulation of metabolic process0.0345284351819145
GO:0051246regulation of protein metabolic process0.035832676683966
GO:0042127regulation of cell proliferation0.0383485746431702
GO:0042981regulation of apoptosis0.0438494987758682
GO:0043067regulation of programmed cell death0.0438494987758682



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
testis1.12e-078
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer4.46e-2351
immune system cancer4.46e-2351
lymphoma2.18e-1310
leukemia2.42e-1239
chronic leukemia1.02e-108
myeloid leukemia1.65e-0731


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F6#187673.902232235764630.0003067423599492730.00316278658611336
EBF1#187965.937644564379340.0001242436507924170.00165614328591056
ELF1#199762.838731972538360.007207863124148630.0298592684472238
JUND#372753.885924412150570.004544089270401160.0214810183909576
MAFK#7975618.06715542521991.92160575057211e-071.04744563144051e-05
MAX#414964.301703672671410.0007597563851723660.00596917152719602
SIN3A#2594253.004935959341740.01401618817346520.0491979793186979
USF1#739153.534166265115530.00692296754081810.0293103537779918



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.