Coexpression cluster:C2756

Full id: C2756_skeletal_Adipocyte_mature_Preadipocyte_Hepatic_Mesenchymal_aorta

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:8543500..8543518,+	p1@LMCD1
Hg19::chr3:8543533..8543553,+	p2@LMCD1
Hg19::chr3:8543561..8543579,+	p3@LMCD1
Hg19::chr3:8543591..8543602,+	p4@LMCD1

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
fat cell	5.84e-09	15
fibroblast	3.95e-07	76

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
organism subdivision	6.52e-14	264
trunk	8.71e-13	199
mesenchyme	3.54e-12	160
entire embryonic mesenchyme	3.54e-12	160
epithelium	8.53e-12	306
cell layer	1.03e-11	309
multi-tissue structure	9.48e-11	342
multi-cellular organism	1.62e-10	656
compound organ	2.69e-10	68
trunk mesenchyme	1.84e-08	122
subdivision of trunk	2.77e-08	112
epithelial tube	5.55e-08	117
anatomical cluster	1.83e-07	373
anatomical conduit	2.41e-07	240
primary circulatory organ	2.42e-07	27
adipose tissue	2.52e-07	14
tube	4.70e-07	192
epithelial vesicle	7.18e-07	78

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
CHD2#1106	4	10.3440228341169	8.73193255208051e-05	0.00129226909991035
CTCF#10664	4	5.36025637307503	0.00121114538164362	0.00818869764442793
E2F1#1869	4	4.90738921487932	0.00172402235736179	0.0106674074874405
E2F6#1876	4	5.01715573169739	0.0015780219347306	0.00998406935489968
FOS#2353	4	8.9979553088944	0.000152514771116863	0.00195178166654504
HEY1#23462	4	4.04011104310571	0.0037530463691798	0.018643664847354
MAFF#23764	2	28.1576782449726	0.00184687618036715	0.0109271414797963
MAX#4149	4	6.45255550900712	0.000576761319564549	0.00486090828389299
MYC#4609	4	5.2222818716094	0.00134430939527274	0.00888822036799755
NFYA#4800	4	18.4255806998305	8.67100748407158e-06	0.000234913450228003
NFYB#4801	4	16.7597932535365	1.26678572070404e-05	0.000311738534129617
NRF1#4899	4	12.2102794477109	4.49717228915276e-05	0.000794855604513158
PAX5#5079	4	6.66956553117783	0.000505277416948326	0.00444609218541294
RFX5#5993	4	12.0479108271951	4.74457429336527e-05	0.000827657582469977
SETDB1#9869	4	40.3200261780105	3.77887289069054e-07	1.8528718583607e-05
SP1#6667	4	5.6983813781409	0.000948260606533398	0.00685271169981605
SP2#6668	4	26.1535304938446	2.13562021071447e-06	7.75528648076526e-05
SRF#6722	4	13.7971782621678	2.75840773062708e-05	0.000585182500465084
TAF1#6872	4	3.34304628574529	0.00800566489870165	0.032294462586153
TCF7L2#6934	4	10.7701765631373	7.42969445082454e-05	0.00115623581992201
YY1#7528	4	4.91117074985386	0.0017187183805544	0.0106992447366467
ZNF263#10127	4	8.22184163701068	0.000218787118095832	0.00249562121306363

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.