Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3432

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:08, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3432_pharyngeal_signet_serous_bile_rectal_clear_mucinous



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:54317486..54317491,-p4@ENST00000418927
Hg19::chr14:54317508..54317523,-p2@ENST00000418927
Hg19::chr14:54317532..54317552,-p1@ENST00000418927


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell4.03e-17253
mesothelial cell3.58e-1419
endodermal cell1.92e-1058
cortical cell of adrenal gland1.07e-082
metabolising cell4.70e-0712
endopolyploid cell4.70e-0712
parenchymal cell4.70e-0712
polyploid cell4.70e-0712
hepatocyte4.70e-0712
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
gut epithelium9.06e-1754
endo-epithelium2.67e-1582
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction5.91e-1525
anatomical boundary5.91e-1525
hepatobiliary system5.91e-1525
foregut-midgut junction5.91e-1525
septum transversum5.91e-1525
biliary system4.22e-149
biliary tree4.22e-149
biliary bud4.22e-149
epithelial sac3.45e-1225
sac1.21e-1126
hepatic diverticulum2.00e-1122
liver primordium2.00e-1122
digestive system5.53e-11145
digestive tract5.53e-11145
primitive gut5.53e-11145
digestive tract diverticulum7.41e-1123
endoderm-derived structure2.81e-10160
endoderm2.81e-10160
presumptive endoderm2.81e-10160
endocrine system3.61e-1045
bile duct6.28e-106
digestive system duct6.28e-106
endocrine gland8.92e-1035
subdivision of digestive tract4.44e-09118
abdomen element4.23e-0854
abdominal segment element4.23e-0854
trunk region element6.38e-08101
immaterial anatomical entity3.59e-07117
gland4.14e-0759
abdominal segment of trunk5.07e-0760
abdomen5.07e-0760
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma1.20e-22106
cell type cancer2.02e-17143
cancer9.84e-17235
disease of cellular proliferation3.51e-16239
disease of anatomical entity2.06e-1239
endocrine gland cancer5.47e-106
adenocarcinoma2.45e-0825


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115056987649153
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0167181420456976
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00896058332887245
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.00580374423224121
FOXA2#3170324.63046375266526.68983856509345e-050.00107159516855797
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.00390586145086422
HNF4A#3172323.13229036295378.07584663437677e-050.00122663372112809
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.015643336977403
MAFF#23764356.31535648994525.59409009993116e-060.000168953492176608
MAFK#7975327.10073313782995.02195559325033e-050.000857006568959921
PRDM1#6393131.8309557774614.35536935195671e-072.07988303497488e-05
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.024594058767828
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00612474720908206



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.