Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3714

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 23:19, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr9:58087404..58087408,-p@chr9:58087404..58087408
-
Mm9::chr9:58097468..58097479,-p2@Pml
Mm9::chr9:58097509..58097598,-p1@Pml


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk7.14e-1290
trunk region element1.66e-1179
endoderm-derived structure3.70e-10118
endoderm3.70e-10118
presumptive endoderm3.70e-10118
digestive system4.72e-10116
digestive tract4.72e-10116
primitive gut4.72e-10116
foregut5.32e-1080
subdivision of digestive tract7.88e-10114
subdivision of trunk1.08e-0966
abdomen element1.46e-0949
abdominal segment element1.46e-0949
abdominal segment of trunk1.46e-0949
abdomen1.46e-0949
immaterial anatomical entity1.55e-0979
organism subdivision3.09e-09150
hemolymphoid system1.65e-0748
immune system1.65e-0748
mesenchyme2.09e-0761
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.09e-0761
hematopoietic system7.16e-0745
blood island7.16e-0745


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}