Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:362

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:11, 10 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{MCL_coexpression_mm9|gostat_on_MCL_coexpression=GO:0014069;postsynaptic density;0.00256092968317102;14799,14812!GO:0007613;memory;0.00256092968317102;14799,14812!GO:0005234;...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:106069742..106069754,+p@chr10:106069742..106069754
+
Mm9::chr11:56825300..56825329,+p1@Gria1
Mm9::chr11:56825334..56825345,+p3@Gria1
Mm9::chr11:56825447..56825448,+p10@Gria1
Mm9::chr13:96214655..96214666,-p2@Crhbp
Mm9::chr14:56129430..56129468,+p1@Cpne6
Mm9::chr14:76362222..76362254,+p@chr14:76362222..76362254
+
Mm9::chr14:76362263..76362291,+p@chr14:76362263..76362291
+
Mm9::chr14:88870750..88870829,-p@chr14:88870750..88870829
-
Mm9::chr16:34514130..34514142,-p17@Kalrn
Mm9::chr16:34514149..34514165,-p11@Kalrn
Mm9::chr16:34514170..34514214,-p3@Kalrn
Mm9::chr16:34514261..34514270,-p19@Kalrn
Mm9::chr16:34514291..34514297,-p27@Kalrn
Mm9::chr16:60605097..60605117,-p1@Epha6
Mm9::chr16:60605371..60605385,-p3@Epha6
Mm9::chr16:60605417..60605435,-p4@Epha6
Mm9::chr16:7217845..7217853,+p33@Rbfox1
Mm9::chr18:86564394..86564405,+p5@Neto1
Mm9::chr6:136123290..136123321,-p@chr6:136123290..136123321
-
Mm9::chr7:98691574..98691605,+p17@Dlg2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0014069postsynaptic density0.00256092968317102
GO:0007613memory0.00256092968317102
GO:0005234extracellular-glutamate-gated ion channel activity0.00256092968317102
GO:0004970ionotropic glutamate receptor activity0.00256092968317102
GO:0005231excitatory extracellular ligand-gated ion channel activity0.0104762422911387
GO:0008066glutamate receptor activity0.0104762422911387
GO:0022836gated channel activity0.0111973697202879
GO:0017047adrenocorticotropin-releasing hormone binding0.014207378685594
GO:0005230extracellular ligand-gated ion channel activity0.014207378685594
GO:0007611learning and/or memory0.014207378685594
GO:0005216ion channel activity0.014207378685594
GO:0022838substrate specific channel activity0.014207378685594
GO:0015276ligand-gated ion channel activity0.014207378685594
GO:0022834ligand-gated channel activity0.014207378685594
GO:0022803passive transmembrane transporter activity0.014207378685594
GO:0015267channel activity0.014207378685594
GO:0017046peptide hormone binding0.0160449762951106
GO:0005624membrane fraction0.0185930011660257
GO:0045211postsynaptic membrane0.0185930011660257
GO:0007616long-term memory0.0185930011660257
GO:0001786phosphatidylserine binding0.0185930011660257
GO:0050966detection of mechanical stimulus during sensory perception of pain0.0185930011660257
GO:0044456synapse part0.0205067839558832
GO:0000267cell fraction0.0215318161976552
GO:0031623receptor internalization0.0218104098803347
GO:0017146N-methyl-D-aspartate selective glutamate receptor complex0.0252373070572831
GO:0048266behavioral response to pain0.0252373070572831
GO:0004972N-methyl-D-aspartate selective glutamate receptor activity0.0291959709185147
GO:0001967suckling behavior0.0314401883232241
GO:0042562hormone binding0.0314401883232241
GO:0015075ion transmembrane transporter activity0.0314401883232241
GO:0060079regulation of excitatory postsynaptic membrane potential0.0330135045063673
GO:0035254glutamate receptor binding0.0330135045063673
GO:0045471response to ethanol0.0358193650359458
GO:0006811ion transport0.0358193650359458
GO:0008328ionotropic glutamate receptor complex0.0358193650359458
GO:0001662behavioral fear response0.0358193650359458
GO:0002209behavioral defense response0.0358193650359458
GO:0022891substrate-specific transmembrane transporter activity0.0371035929292651
GO:0050974detection of mechanical stimulus during sensory perception0.0371035929292651
GO:0048265response to pain0.0371035929292651
GO:0060078regulation of postsynaptic membrane potential0.0371035929292651
GO:0001964startle response0.0371035929292651
GO:0042734presynaptic membrane0.0371035929292651
GO:0050982detection of mechanical stimulus0.0392926393149871
GO:0005261cation channel activity0.0396606778395125
GO:0005003ephrin receptor activity0.0396606778395125
GO:0048168regulation of neuronal synaptic plasticity0.0396606778395125
GO:0042596fear response0.0416161106041566
GO:0006898receptor-mediated endocytosis0.0427397751399025
GO:0022857transmembrane transporter activity0.0427397751399025
GO:0009612response to mechanical stimulus0.0435838236247918
GO:0051899membrane depolarization0.0435838236247918
GO:0005856cytoskeleton0.0448179055878803
GO:0046873metal ion transmembrane transporter activity0.0449524136953147



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:



"{{{coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median}}}" is not a number.

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}