Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3250

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:46, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr1:175350687..175350695,+p4@Aim2
Mm9::chr1:175350698..175350753,+p1@Aim2
Mm9::chr1:175350759..175350770,+p3@Aim2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system1.08e-1548
immune system1.08e-1548
hematopoietic system1.33e-1345
blood island1.33e-1345
hemopoietic organ3.96e-0929
immune organ3.96e-0929
digestive system4.06e-09116
digestive tract4.06e-09116
primitive gut4.06e-09116
endoderm-derived structure4.52e-09118
endoderm4.52e-09118
presumptive endoderm4.52e-09118
lateral plate mesoderm9.53e-0987
subdivision of digestive tract3.00e-08114
gland of gut8.71e-0824
thymus2.28e-0723
neck2.28e-0723
respiratory system epithelium2.28e-0723
hemolymphoid system gland2.28e-0723
pharyngeal epithelium2.28e-0723
thymic region2.28e-0723
pharyngeal gland2.28e-0723
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.28e-0723
thymus primordium2.28e-0723
early pharyngeal endoderm2.28e-0723
unilaminar epithelium2.63e-0766
connective tissue3.93e-0746
endo-epithelium5.07e-0769
pharynx8.70e-0724
upper respiratory tract8.70e-0724
chordate pharynx8.70e-0724
pharyngeal arch system8.70e-0724
pharyngeal region of foregut8.70e-0724
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure9.54e-0735


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}