Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C785

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:42, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C785_basal_mesenchymal_chorionic_leiomyoma_mesodermal_Fibroblast_Mesothelial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:69686723..69686726,-p@chr10:69686723..69686726
-
Hg19::chr10:92754444..92754453,+p3@ENST00000412362
Hg19::chr13:38109071..38109077,+p1@FLJ34747
Hg19::chr17:39264496..39264528,+p@chr17:39264496..39264528
+
Hg19::chr22:33258742..33258764,+p@chr22:33258742..33258764
+
Hg19::chr2:217529087..217529099,+p@chr2:217529087..217529099
+
Hg19::chr4:73248974..73249005,+p@chr4:73248974..73249005
+
Hg19::chr4:75180763..75180777,+p@chr4:75180763..75180777
+
Hg19::chr5:11385554..11385566,-p28@CTNND2
Hg19::chr5:11385573..11385583,-p47@CTNND2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0007158neuron adhesion0.00947839397150595



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
receptor cell1.64e-336
sensory epithelial cell1.64e-336
olfactory epithelial cell1.64e-336
neurecto-epithelial cell1.40e-1020
columnar/cuboidal epithelial cell5.37e-0827
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
spleen1.30e-083
gastrointestinal system mesentery1.30e-083
stomach region1.30e-083
mesentery1.30e-083
gastrointestinal system serosa1.30e-083
mesentery of stomach1.30e-083
gut mesentery1.30e-083
dorsal mesentery1.30e-083
dorsal mesogastrium1.30e-083
peritoneal cavity1.30e-083
spleen primordium1.30e-083
zone of skin6.50e-074
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
basal cell carcinoma1.07e-231
spindle cell sarcoma2.62e-231
skin carcinoma1.48e-122
skin cancer1.48e-122
integumentary system cancer1.48e-122


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.