Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2391

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:20, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr4:111678794..111678804,+p3@Skint1
Mm9::chr4:111745263..111745279,+p2@Skint4
Mm9::chr4:112447421..112447437,-p1@Skint10
Mm9::chr4:112447446..112447459,-p2@Skint10


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
thymus2.48e-1223
neck2.48e-1223
respiratory system epithelium2.48e-1223
hemolymphoid system gland2.48e-1223
pharyngeal epithelium2.48e-1223
thymic region2.48e-1223
pharyngeal gland2.48e-1223
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.48e-1223
thymus primordium2.48e-1223
early pharyngeal endoderm2.48e-1223
pharynx1.19e-1124
gland of gut1.19e-1124
upper respiratory tract1.19e-1124
chordate pharynx1.19e-1124
pharyngeal arch system1.19e-1124
pharyngeal region of foregut1.19e-1124
zone of skin6.27e-105
skin epidermis6.27e-105
skin of body6.27e-105
integument6.27e-105
surface6.27e-105
outer epithelium6.27e-105
integumental system6.27e-105
enveloping layer of ectoderm6.27e-105
segment of respiratory tract6.36e-1027
hemopoietic organ5.64e-0929
immune organ5.64e-0929
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure8.52e-0835
anterior region of body1.26e-0743
craniocervical region1.92e-0736
organ segment8.33e-0735


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}