Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2931

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:09, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr14:66588551..66588575,+p3@Clu
Mm9::chr14:66588578..66588629,+p2@Clu
Mm9::chr14:66588638..66588658,+p5@Clu


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
immaterial anatomical entity9.83e-1979
organ7.88e-13266
trunk region element5.03e-1279
exocrine gland7.80e-1125
exocrine system7.80e-1125
abdomen element3.40e-1049
abdominal segment element3.40e-1049
abdominal segment of trunk3.40e-1049
abdomen3.40e-1049
subdivision of trunk3.67e-1066
tube7.29e-10114
anatomical space8.12e-1057
liver8.73e-1022
epithelial sac8.73e-1022
digestive gland8.73e-1022
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction8.73e-1022
anatomical boundary8.73e-1022
hepatobiliary system8.73e-1022
foregut-midgut junction8.73e-1022
hepatic diverticulum8.73e-1022
liver primordium8.73e-1022
septum transversum8.73e-1022
liver bud8.73e-1022
digestive tract diverticulum1.04e-0923
sac1.04e-0923
anatomical cavity1.08e-0939
body cavity precursor1.21e-0938
anatomical conduit1.47e-09122
body cavity2.61e-0937
body cavity or lining2.61e-0937
trunk4.57e-0890
epithelial tube2.64e-0747
adult organism2.78e-0751
anatomical system4.18e-07308
anatomical group4.18e-07308
trunk mesenchyme9.15e-0745


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}