Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3157

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:29, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr18:66162266..66162291,-p1@Lman1
Mm9::chr8:42219005..42219017,-p12@Mtus1
Mm9::chr8:42219051..42219109,-p2@Mtus1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005793ER-Golgi intermediate compartment0.0188446682258026
GO:0005794Golgi apparatus0.0196283784355713
GO:0006888ER to Golgi vesicle-mediated transport0.0251179638509013
GO:0048193Golgi vesicle transport0.0447143975768353
GO:0030017sarcomere0.0452542954370894
GO:0044449contractile fiber part0.0452542954370894
GO:0030016myofibril0.0452542954370894
GO:0043292contractile fiber0.0452542954370894



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk region element3.05e-1079
immaterial anatomical entity6.31e-1079
exocrine gland1.05e-0825
exocrine system1.05e-0825
trunk2.10e-0890
liver4.04e-0722
epithelial sac4.04e-0722
digestive gland4.04e-0722
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction4.04e-0722
anatomical boundary4.04e-0722
hepatobiliary system4.04e-0722
foregut-midgut junction4.04e-0722
hepatic diverticulum4.04e-0722
liver primordium4.04e-0722
septum transversum4.04e-0722
liver bud4.04e-0722
multi-cellular organism5.55e-07333


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}