Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3182

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:32, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr19:30249869..30249884,-p4@Gldc
Mm9::chr19:30249885..30249896,-p3@Gldc
Mm9::chr19:30249904..30249926,-p1@Gldc


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
exocrine gland5.10e-1525
exocrine system5.10e-1525
pre-chordal neural plate5.43e-1549
neurectoderm6.72e-1564
neural plate6.72e-1564
presumptive neural plate6.72e-1564
liver1.46e-1422
epithelial sac1.46e-1422
digestive gland1.46e-1422
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.46e-1422
anatomical boundary1.46e-1422
hepatobiliary system1.46e-1422
foregut-midgut junction1.46e-1422
hepatic diverticulum1.46e-1422
liver primordium1.46e-1422
septum transversum1.46e-1422
liver bud1.46e-1422
digestive tract diverticulum1.97e-1323
sac1.97e-1323
ecto-epithelium4.50e-1373
ectoderm-derived structure7.27e-1295
ectoderm7.27e-1295
presumptive ectoderm7.27e-1295
regional part of forebrain5.04e-1139
forebrain5.04e-1139
future forebrain5.04e-1139
brain8.20e-1147
future brain8.20e-1147
regional part of nervous system1.14e-1054
anterior neural tube2.08e-1040
regional part of brain2.81e-1046
tube3.04e-10114
neural tube4.43e-1052
neural rod4.43e-1052
future spinal cord4.43e-1052
neural keel4.43e-1052
central nervous system5.94e-1073
abdomen element3.02e-0949
abdominal segment element3.02e-0949
abdominal segment of trunk3.02e-0949
abdomen3.02e-0949
nervous system3.41e-0975
anatomical conduit1.32e-08122
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.69e-0892
gray matter9.61e-0834
brain grey matter1.59e-0729
regional part of telencephalon1.59e-0729
telencephalon1.59e-0729
cerebral cortex3.20e-0721
cerebral hemisphere3.20e-0721
pallium3.20e-0721
trunk mesenchyme9.82e-0745


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}