Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3234

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:36, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr1:138825876..138825887,-p@chr1:138825876..138825887
-
Mm9::chr1:138838880..138838882,-p@chr1:138838880..138838882
-
Mm9::chr1:138846079..138846103,-p6@Nr5a2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
immaterial anatomical entity6.97e-1479
liver1.88e-1222
epithelial sac1.88e-1222
digestive gland1.88e-1222
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.88e-1222
anatomical boundary1.88e-1222
hepatobiliary system1.88e-1222
foregut-midgut junction1.88e-1222
hepatic diverticulum1.88e-1222
liver primordium1.88e-1222
septum transversum1.88e-1222
liver bud1.88e-1222
intestine4.22e-1231
gastrointestinal system9.72e-1247
digestive tract diverticulum1.52e-1123
sac1.52e-1123
endoderm-derived structure2.22e-11118
endoderm2.22e-11118
presumptive endoderm2.22e-11118
pancreas2.73e-1112
digestive system7.51e-11116
digestive tract7.51e-11116
primitive gut7.51e-11116
subdivision of digestive tract1.05e-10114
exocrine gland5.77e-1025
exocrine system5.77e-1025
trunk region element6.41e-1079
viscus4.25e-0919
body cavity2.41e-0737
body cavity or lining2.41e-0737
body cavity precursor6.23e-0738
trunk7.27e-0790


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}