Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3973

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:36, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3973_bronchogenic_chorionic_hepatoblastoma_small_testicular_rectum_adenocarcinoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:3371210..3371219,+p9@ARHGEF16
Hg19::chr1:3371222..3371243,+p1@ARHGEF16
Hg19::chr1:3371261..3371278,+p4@ARHGEF16


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure2.23e-21160
endoderm2.23e-21160
presumptive endoderm2.23e-21160
digestive system3.17e-19145
digestive tract3.17e-19145
primitive gut3.17e-19145
subdivision of digestive tract1.28e-18118
trunk region element5.78e-13101
respiratory primordium1.79e-1238
endoderm of foregut1.79e-1238
respiratory tract1.79e-1254
foregut1.80e-1287
respiratory system1.06e-1174
segment of respiratory tract3.04e-1147
urinary system structure1.33e-0947
renal system3.25e-0948
subdivision of trunk4.31e-09112
gastrointestinal system5.25e-0925
organ system subdivision9.42e-09223
immaterial anatomical entity1.15e-08117
larynx1.16e-089
organ part1.34e-08218
endo-epithelium3.16e-0882
anatomical space3.28e-0895
cavitated compound organ5.17e-0831
organ segment6.92e-0898
kidney1.02e-0726
kidney mesenchyme1.02e-0726
upper urinary tract1.02e-0726
kidney rudiment1.02e-0726
kidney field1.02e-0726
organ1.25e-07503
nephron tubule epithelium1.70e-0710
abdomen element4.05e-0754
abdominal segment element4.05e-0754
respiratory tract epithelium6.60e-0719
lung epithelium6.60e-0719
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.84e-41106
cell type cancer1.56e-29143
cancer2.25e-16235
disease of cellular proliferation8.09e-16239
squamous cell carcinoma1.03e-0914
adenocarcinoma3.98e-0825


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.54338
MA0004.11.93041
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.14.7105
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.12.45333
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.11.06172
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.15.50871
MA0059.11.70014
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.12.26659
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.11.84783
MA0093.13.82193
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.11.52002
MA0105.11.5295
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.11.3784
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.13.97071
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.13.85295
MA0146.12.3244
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.21.141
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.24.75888
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.22.13189
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.731309
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.13.52399
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.26.90173
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0279709254124962
CTCFL#140690319.74647435897440.0001298372005551160.00171929344348622
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.032567605818757
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0322585811271754
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0320953450022959
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00664591910148469
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00309336835228226
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190479579918148
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00421993484773737
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140359582220808
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109525123020795



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.