Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:642

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:79755159..79755181,+p2@LOC100046223
p2@Rps15
Mm9::chr15:5066589..5066629,+p2@Gm13826
p2@Rpl37
Mm9::chr1:16094477..16094516,-p1@Rpl7
Mm9::chr1:39424661..39424693,+p2@Gm10191
p2@Gm13004
p2@Gm7689
p2@Gm8759
p2@LOC100505081
p2@LOC638399
p2@Rpl31
Mm9::chr1:72757812..72757826,+p2@Gm14173
p2@Rpl37a
Mm9::chr2:26766267..26766289,+p2@Gm11362
p2@Rpl7a
Mm9::chr3:85946515..85946558,-p1@Rps3a
Mm9::chr5:121654486..121654508,+p2@Gm6136
p2@Rpl6
Mm9::chr7:25669587..25669626,+p1@Rps19-ps4
p1@Rps19-ps6
p1@Rps19
Mm9::chr9:106331730..106331788,+p2@Gm10913
p2@Gm13141
p2@Gm13841
p2@Gm6344
p2@Gm6887
p2@Gm8210
p2@Rpl29
Mm9::chrX:99384678..99384703,-p2@Rps4x


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data




Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br><br><br>



TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs