Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4831: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.4497535132128

Latest revision as of 14:20, 17 September 2013


Full id: C4831_smooth_aorta_optic_granulosa_colon_globus_substantia



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:79520989..79521001,-p3@PRUNE2
Hg19::chr9:79521006..79521040,-p1@PRUNE2
Hg19::chr9:79521045..79521056,-p4@PRUNE2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism6.23e-35114
neural tube7.35e-2656
neural rod7.35e-2656
future spinal cord7.35e-2656
neural keel7.35e-2656
regional part of nervous system8.70e-2453
regional part of brain8.70e-2453
central nervous system8.52e-2281
brain1.48e-2168
future brain1.48e-2168
regional part of forebrain1.50e-2041
forebrain1.50e-2041
anterior neural tube1.50e-2041
future forebrain1.50e-2041
neural plate1.78e-2082
presumptive neural plate1.78e-2082
nervous system3.01e-2089
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.13e-19132
neurectoderm2.63e-1886
ecto-epithelium4.76e-17104
telencephalon3.10e-1634
brain grey matter3.42e-1634
gray matter3.42e-1634
pre-chordal neural plate3.84e-1561
regional part of telencephalon7.69e-1532
cerebral hemisphere9.28e-1532
ectoderm-derived structure1.07e-14171
ectoderm1.07e-14171
presumptive ectoderm1.07e-14171
cerebral cortex5.59e-1125
pallium5.59e-1125
regional part of cerebral cortex1.15e-1022
organ system subdivision1.21e-10223
neocortex1.26e-0920
multi-tissue structure1.17e-08342
organ3.80e-08503
multi-cellular organism1.16e-07656
organ part4.25e-07218
neural nucleus6.95e-079
nucleus of brain6.95e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.16.86157
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.11.5435
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.14.7105
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.557638
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.886807
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.12.13518
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.11.36698
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.14.76891
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.846801
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.752137
MA0146.10.707589
MA0147.12.37462
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.22.74132
MA0138.22.38017
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.23.15214
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.22.07067
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.11.43223
MA0163.10.387745
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.21.54885
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.11.40979
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0281789957133247
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0328265109655015
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0322936697209821
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0296502183989384
REST#597839.650028716128020.001112636247114590.0077211041204253
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0278634608410157
SRF#6722313.79717826216780.0003806615025800190.00376761814518144
SUZ12#23512350.11578091106297.93834897779404e-060.000223952790084233
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00546341321457847
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0191387267465765
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00423457176156357
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0110290178763897



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.