Coexpression cluster:C3386

Full id: C3386_gastric_Trabecular_Keratocytes_Neural_rhabdomyosarcoma_embryonic_Fibroblast

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr13:80915235..80915251,-	p3@SPRY2
Hg19::chr13:80915252..80915274,-	p1@SPRY2
Hg19::chr13:80915289..80915300,-	p4@SPRY2

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
non-terminally differentiated cell	3.60e-18	180
embryonic cell	9.00e-09	248
electrically responsive cell	1.14e-08	60
electrically active cell	1.14e-08	60
contractile cell	3.33e-08	59
muscle precursor cell	3.34e-08	57
myoblast	3.34e-08	57
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell	3.34e-08	57
vascular associated smooth muscle cell	6.07e-08	32
muscle cell	6.85e-08	54
smooth muscle cell	3.66e-07	42
smooth muscle myoblast	3.66e-07	42
mesodermal cell	7.22e-07	119

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
cell layer	1.63e-24	312
epithelium	2.31e-24	309
organism subdivision	1.49e-22	365
tube	3.03e-21	194
anatomical conduit	3.49e-21	241
multi-tissue structure	7.72e-21	347
anatomical cluster	4.56e-20	286
multi-cellular organism	4.54e-19	659
anatomical system	3.51e-18	625
anatomical group	8.41e-18	626
ectoderm-derived structure	3.41e-17	169
embryo	8.80e-17	612
ectoderm	1.45e-15	173
presumptive ectoderm	1.45e-15	173
neural plate	1.53e-15	86
presumptive neural plate	1.53e-15	86
head	8.98e-15	123
embryonic structure	1.12e-14	605
developing anatomical structure	1.12e-14	605
germ layer	1.81e-14	604
embryonic tissue	1.81e-14	604
presumptive structure	1.81e-14	604
epiblast (generic)	1.81e-14	604
somite	2.15e-14	83
paraxial mesoderm	2.15e-14	83
presomitic mesoderm	2.15e-14	83
presumptive segmental plate	2.15e-14	83
trunk paraxial mesoderm	2.15e-14	83
presumptive paraxial mesoderm	2.15e-14	83
neurectoderm	2.42e-13	90
anterior region of body	3.64e-13	129
craniocervical region	3.64e-13	129
regional part of nervous system	5.33e-13	94
nervous system	5.33e-13	94
vasculature	5.61e-13	79
vascular system	5.61e-13	79
trunk mesenchyme	9.45e-13	143
epithelial tube	2.23e-12	118
neural tube	3.01e-12	57
neural rod	3.01e-12	57
future spinal cord	3.01e-12	57
neural keel	3.01e-12	57
artery	4.79e-12	42
arterial blood vessel	4.79e-12	42
arterial system	4.79e-12	42
central nervous system	6.22e-12	82
dermomyotome	1.15e-11	70
vessel	1.80e-11	69
blood vessel	7.57e-11	60
epithelial tube open at both ends	7.57e-11	60
blood vasculature	7.57e-11	60
vascular cord	7.57e-11	60
pre-chordal neural plate	1.52e-10	61
regional part of brain	2.71e-10	59
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm	2.97e-10	84
systemic artery	7.64e-10	33
systemic arterial system	7.64e-10	33
multilaminar epithelium	2.69e-09	82
brain	2.89e-09	69
future brain	2.89e-09	69
skeletal muscle tissue	9.91e-09	61
striated muscle tissue	9.91e-09	61
myotome	9.91e-09	61
muscle tissue	1.37e-08	63
musculature	1.37e-08	63
musculature of body	1.37e-08	63
gray matter	1.79e-08	34
brain grey matter	1.79e-08	34
organ	1.86e-08	511
trunk	3.16e-08	216
circulatory system	5.83e-08	113
telencephalon	5.85e-08	34
cardiovascular system	7.79e-08	110
regional part of telencephalon	8.54e-08	33
anterior neural tube	8.65e-08	42
organ part	1.12e-07	219
cerebral hemisphere	1.52e-07	32
regional part of forebrain	1.76e-07	41
forebrain	1.76e-07	41
future forebrain	1.76e-07	41
mesenchyme	6.13e-07	238
entire embryonic mesenchyme	6.13e-07	238

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.