Coexpression cluster:C1936

Full id: C1936_Wilms_extraskeletal_Skeletal_uterus_cervix_lung_salivary

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:148402078..148402099,+	p4@EDNRA
Hg19::chr4:148402109..148402132,+	p2@EDNRA
Hg19::chr4:148402212..148402230,+	p3@EDNRA
Hg19::chr4:148402237..148402276,+	p1@EDNRA
Hg19::chr4:148402291..148402302,+	p5@EDNRA

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
non-terminally differentiated cell	2.29e-17	180
fibroblast	5.24e-11	75
muscle precursor cell	9.67e-09	57
myoblast	9.67e-09	57
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell	9.67e-09	57
contractile cell	1.10e-08	59
muscle cell	2.67e-08	54
electrically responsive cell	4.65e-08	60
electrically active cell	4.65e-08	60
smooth muscle cell	2.54e-07	42
smooth muscle myoblast	2.54e-07	42

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
multi-tissue structure	2.33e-27	347
organism subdivision	3.60e-25	365
multi-cellular organism	7.89e-18	659
somite	1.50e-14	83
paraxial mesoderm	1.50e-14	83
presomitic mesoderm	1.50e-14	83
presumptive segmental plate	1.50e-14	83
trunk paraxial mesoderm	1.50e-14	83
presumptive paraxial mesoderm	1.50e-14	83
adult organism	1.67e-14	115
anatomical cluster	4.47e-14	286
cell layer	4.63e-14	312
embryo	9.10e-14	612
ectoderm	1.35e-13	173
presumptive ectoderm	1.35e-13	173
epithelium	4.50e-13	309
anatomical system	5.45e-13	625
anatomical group	6.76e-13	626
anterior region of body	7.25e-13	129
craniocervical region	7.25e-13	129
ectoderm-derived structure	9.47e-13	169
surface structure	1.31e-12	95
head	1.79e-12	123
dermomyotome	2.92e-12	70
embryonic structure	3.80e-12	605
developing anatomical structure	3.80e-12	605
germ layer	9.52e-12	604
embryonic tissue	9.52e-12	604
presumptive structure	9.52e-12	604
epiblast (generic)	9.52e-12	604
mesenchyme	1.56e-11	238
entire embryonic mesenchyme	1.56e-11	238
multilaminar epithelium	6.53e-11	82
muscle tissue	9.37e-11	63
musculature	9.37e-11	63
musculature of body	9.37e-11	63
trunk mesenchyme	1.85e-10	143
skeletal muscle tissue	3.73e-10	61
striated muscle tissue	3.73e-10	61
myotome	3.73e-10	61
organ	3.02e-09	511
neurectoderm	6.08e-09	90
anatomical conduit	1.35e-08	241
trunk	1.41e-08	216
organ part	2.31e-08	219
neural plate	3.87e-08	86
presumptive neural plate	3.87e-08	86
compound organ	6.23e-08	69
subdivision of head	1.63e-07	48
regional part of nervous system	3.07e-07	94
nervous system	3.07e-07	94
tissue	6.27e-07	787
central nervous system	6.50e-07	82
regional part of brain	9.59e-07	59

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
TCF7L2#6934	5	10.7701765631373	6.89693748574565e-06	0.000200085903909386
ZNF263#10127	5	8.22184163701068	2.6606316672286e-05	0.000572109760538786

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.