Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C910

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:58, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C910_hepatic_smooth_Ewing_Adipocyte_left_Olfactory_umbilical



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:63349229..63349248,-p@chr15:63349229..63349248
-
Hg19::chr15:63349302..63349328,-p@chr15:63349302..63349328
-
Hg19::chr15:63351782..63351815,-p@chr15:63351782..63351815
-
Hg19::chr15:63351824..63351851,-p@chr15:63351824..63351851
-
Hg19::chr15:63351866..63351889,-p@chr15:63351866..63351889
-
Hg19::chr15:63353101..63353147,-p@chr15:63353101..63353147
-
Hg19::chr15:63354440..63354463,-p@chr15:63354440..63354463
-
Hg19::chr15:63354769..63354809,+p8@TPM1
Hg19::chr15:63363279..63363308,+p2@AL358752


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005862muscle thin filament tropomyosin0.00470976097963028
GO:0005865striated muscle thin filament0.00647592134699164
GO:0006937regulation of muscle contraction0.00685056142491677
GO:0008016regulation of heart contraction0.00685056142491677
GO:0008307structural constituent of muscle0.00685056142491677
GO:0003015heart process0.00685056142491677
GO:0060047heart contraction0.00685056142491677
GO:0030017sarcomere0.00685056142491677
GO:0030016myofibril0.00685056142491677
GO:0044449contractile fiber part0.00685056142491677
GO:0043292contractile fiber0.00685056142491677
GO:0008015blood circulation0.0129518426939833
GO:0003013circulatory system process0.0129518426939833
GO:0003012muscle system process0.0129518426939833
GO:0006936muscle contraction0.0129518426939833
GO:0051239regulation of multicellular organismal process0.0203844342399623
GO:0015629actin cytoskeleton0.0205013124995671
GO:0051674localization of cell0.0237347165157684
GO:0006928cell motility0.0237347165157684
GO:0003779actin binding0.0257859413634758
GO:0008092cytoskeletal protein binding0.0338093556037745
GO:0044430cytoskeletal part0.049131370219325



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-cellular organism2.95e-14659
trunk mesenchyme1.04e-13143
organism subdivision2.62e-13365
muscle tissue3.18e-1363
musculature3.18e-1363
musculature of body3.18e-1363
multi-tissue structure1.12e-12347
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.21e-1284
trunk1.50e-12216
skeletal muscle tissue2.09e-1261
striated muscle tissue2.09e-1261
myotome2.09e-1261
somite3.64e-1283
paraxial mesoderm3.64e-1283
presomitic mesoderm3.64e-1283
presumptive segmental plate3.64e-1283
trunk paraxial mesoderm3.64e-1283
presumptive paraxial mesoderm3.64e-1283
epithelial tube1.07e-11118
dermomyotome1.11e-1170
multilaminar epithelium1.72e-1182
artery1.27e-1042
arterial blood vessel1.27e-1042
arterial system1.27e-1042
vasculature1.30e-1079
vascular system1.30e-1079
circulatory system3.28e-10113
anatomical system5.28e-10625
anatomical group7.90e-10626
mesenchyme1.02e-09238
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.02e-09238
blood vessel1.05e-0960
epithelial tube open at both ends1.05e-0960
blood vasculature1.05e-0960
vascular cord1.05e-0960
unilaminar epithelium2.19e-09138
systemic artery3.13e-0933
systemic arterial system3.13e-0933
cardiovascular system3.84e-09110
epithelium4.43e-09309
cell layer6.86e-09312
vessel1.29e-0869
anatomical cluster6.66e-08286
primary circulatory organ6.78e-0827
compound organ9.03e-0769


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.