Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1165

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:26, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr18:57292623..57292657,+p1@Megf10
Mm9::chr18:57292662..57292683,+p5@Megf10
Mm9::chr18:57292706..57292717,+p10@Megf10
Mm9::chr18:57292719..57292733,+p4@Megf10
Mm9::chr18:57293027..57293076,+p2@Megf10
Mm9::chr18:57293101..57293116,+p9@Megf10
Mm9::chr18:57293120..57293158,+p3@Megf10


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system3.55e-3675
ectoderm-derived structure2.66e-3595
ectoderm2.66e-3595
presumptive ectoderm2.66e-3595
central nervous system2.73e-3473
neurectoderm4.83e-2564
neural plate4.83e-2564
presumptive neural plate4.83e-2564
ecto-epithelium1.22e-2373
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.29e-2392
regional part of nervous system9.82e-2154
neural tube2.37e-1952
neural rod2.37e-1952
future spinal cord2.37e-1952
neural keel2.37e-1952
brain1.31e-1747
future brain1.31e-1747
pre-chordal neural plate3.45e-1749
regional part of brain6.55e-1746
anterior neural tube3.44e-1440
regional part of forebrain1.41e-1339
forebrain1.41e-1339
future forebrain1.41e-1339
gray matter4.31e-1334
brain grey matter1.44e-1129
regional part of telencephalon1.44e-1129
telencephalon1.44e-1129
peripheral nervous system1.05e-0911
cerebral cortex9.93e-0921
cerebral hemisphere9.93e-0921
pallium9.93e-0921
autonomic nervous system4.19e-089


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}