Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2584

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:38, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:79459224..79459250,+p1@Abca7
Mm9::chr19:7093830..7093905,-p1@Fermt3
Mm9::chr8:72520162..72520197,-p4@Gatad2a


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0021995neuropore closure0.0117228154558162
GO:0021506anterior neuropore closure0.0117228154558162
GO:0001842neural fold formation0.0117228154558162
GO:0010172embryonic body morphogenesis0.0117228154558162
GO:0010171body morphogenesis0.0117228154558162



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system3.71e-1648
immune system3.71e-1648
hematopoietic system5.37e-1545
blood island5.37e-1545
bone marrow6.11e-1016
bone element3.66e-0822
skeletal element3.66e-0822
skeletal system3.66e-0822
musculoskeletal system6.86e-0832
connective tissue9.29e-0846
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure3.87e-0735
endoderm-derived structure6.93e-07118
endoderm6.93e-07118
presumptive endoderm6.93e-07118
hemopoietic organ7.28e-0729
immune organ7.28e-0729


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}