Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4222

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:46, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4222_Fibroblast_Mast_Smooth_mesenchymal_Myoblast_Preadipocyte_basal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:33824285..33824308,-p2@FAM98A
Hg19::chr2:33824309..33824326,-p3@FAM98A
Hg19::chr2:33824336..33824378,-p1@FAM98A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
somite1.08e-2383
paraxial mesoderm1.08e-2383
presomitic mesoderm1.08e-2383
presumptive segmental plate1.08e-2383
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.08e-2383
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.08e-2383
dermomyotome1.80e-1870
multilaminar epithelium9.25e-1682
skeletal muscle tissue1.13e-1461
striated muscle tissue1.13e-1461
myotome1.13e-1461
muscle tissue1.07e-1363
musculature1.07e-1363
musculature of body1.07e-1363
organism subdivision1.12e-12365
vasculature2.61e-1279
vascular system2.61e-1279
artery3.32e-1242
arterial blood vessel3.32e-1242
arterial system3.32e-1242
surface structure7.65e-1295
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.01e-1184
trunk mesenchyme2.11e-11143
systemic artery4.60e-1133
systemic arterial system4.60e-1133
integument4.85e-1145
integumental system4.85e-1145
blood vessel1.37e-1060
epithelial tube open at both ends1.37e-1060
blood vasculature1.37e-1060
vascular cord1.37e-1060
vessel1.46e-1069
unilaminar epithelium9.53e-10138
skin of body1.90e-0940
cardiovascular system2.71e-08110
trunk3.53e-08216
circulatory system4.13e-08113
cell layer2.50e-07312
multi-tissue structure3.26e-07347
epithelium5.45e-07309
aorta7.95e-0721
aortic system7.95e-0721
skull9.13e-0711


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.