Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:905

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:26, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:49715305..49715397,+p1@Rasgef1c
Mm9::chr14:84845135..84845167,+p@chr14:84845135..84845167
+
Mm9::chr15:76062491..76062506,-p29@Plec
Mm9::chr17:72953998..72954016,-p2@Alk
Mm9::chr6:103460572..103460599,+p10@Chl1
Mm9::chr6:103460625..103460628,+p15@Chl1
Mm9::chr6:103460633..103460654,+p6@Chl1
Mm9::chr6:103460663..103460691,+p8@Chl1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system1.50e-3175
central nervous system3.16e-3073
ectoderm-derived structure1.56e-2995
ectoderm1.56e-2995
presumptive ectoderm1.56e-2995
neurectoderm4.86e-2164
neural plate4.86e-2164
presumptive neural plate4.86e-2164
ecto-epithelium3.13e-2073
neural tube8.92e-1952
neural rod8.92e-1952
future spinal cord8.92e-1952
neural keel8.92e-1952
regional part of nervous system2.01e-1854
gray matter3.80e-1634
brain5.60e-1547
future brain5.60e-1547
regional part of brain1.94e-1446
anterior neural tube4.41e-1440
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.04e-1492
pre-chordal neural plate5.22e-1449
regional part of forebrain1.93e-1339
forebrain1.93e-1339
future forebrain1.93e-1339
brain grey matter2.22e-1229
regional part of telencephalon2.22e-1229
telencephalon2.22e-1229
peripheral nervous system6.15e-1011
autonomic nervous system5.88e-099
cerebral cortex1.62e-0721
cerebral hemisphere1.62e-0721
pallium1.62e-0721


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}