Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2201

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:05, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr17:29374721..29374772,-p2@Cpne5
Mm9::chr17:29375015..29375028,-p5@Cpne5
Mm9::chr17:29375034..29375111,-p1@Cpne5
Mm9::chr7:94732832..94732837,+p8@Grm5


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0001639PLC activating metabotropic glutamate receptor activity0.00876544222422034



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)1.08e-0923
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)1.08e-0923

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.40e-1892
regional part of nervous system8.70e-1754
neurectoderm1.23e-1664
neural plate1.23e-1664
presumptive neural plate1.23e-1664
neural tube5.43e-1652
neural rod5.43e-1652
future spinal cord5.43e-1652
neural keel5.43e-1652
ecto-epithelium3.74e-1573
pre-chordal neural plate5.84e-1549
gray matter7.27e-1434
anterior neural tube9.85e-1440
regional part of forebrain4.46e-1339
forebrain4.46e-1339
future forebrain4.46e-1339
brain5.94e-1347
future brain5.94e-1347
central nervous system1.70e-1273
regional part of brain2.35e-1246
nervous system9.23e-1275
ectoderm-derived structure1.23e-1195
ectoderm1.23e-1195
presumptive ectoderm1.23e-1195
brain grey matter1.32e-1029
regional part of telencephalon1.32e-1029
telencephalon1.32e-1029
occipital lobe5.68e-0810
visual cortex5.68e-0810
neocortex5.68e-0810


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}