Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C992

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:00, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C992_Dendritic_melanoma_immature_CD19_Basophils_CD14_Preadipocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:18343988..18344011,-p4@HPS5
Hg19::chr14:105528224..105528238,+p@chr14:105528224..105528238
+
Hg19::chr16:67564182..67564203,-p@chr16:67564182..67564203
-
Hg19::chr1:168195229..168195294,+p1@SFT2D2
p1@TBX19
Hg19::chr1:179051025..179051051,-p@chr1:179051025..179051051
-
Hg19::chr3:49762081..49762093,-p@chr3:49762081..49762093
-
Hg19::chr5:115420945..115420957,-p@chr5:115420945..115420957
-
Hg19::chr6:44231019..44231045,-p@chr6:44231019..44231045
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte6.95e-53140
nongranular leukocyte4.67e-44119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.71e-44124
hematopoietic cell1.44e-42182
hematopoietic stem cell3.02e-42172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.02e-42172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.92e-38165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.92e-38165
myeloid leukocyte2.27e-2976
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.42e-2871
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.12e-2665
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.95e-2670
monopoietic cell1.76e-2563
monocyte1.76e-2563
monoblast1.76e-2563
promonocyte1.76e-2563
mesenchymal cell2.80e-24358
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte9.28e-2442
connective tissue cell2.63e-23365
classical monocyte1.31e-2245
motile cell4.85e-22390
myeloid cell4.56e-21112
common myeloid progenitor4.56e-21112
lymphocyte5.61e-1653
common lymphoid progenitor5.61e-1653
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.06e-1552
multi fate stem cell9.54e-14430
somatic stem cell7.32e-13436
stem cell2.41e-12444
lymphocyte of B lineage6.14e-0924
pro-B cell6.14e-0924
native cell1.08e-08722
B cell4.99e-0814
dendritic cell5.29e-0710
intermediate monocyte6.53e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte6.53e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system6.59e-30102
blood island6.59e-30102
hemolymphoid system1.79e-26112
bone marrow6.27e-2580
bone element5.57e-2286
connective tissue1.41e-20375
skeletal element4.29e-18101
skeletal system4.29e-18101
immune system2.43e-16115
lateral plate mesoderm9.15e-09216


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.