Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3937

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:34, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3937_Mesenchymal_Renal_Alveolar_Pericytes_Placental_Fibroblast_Osteoblast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:2126156..2126167,-p3@C1orf86
Hg19::chr1:2126174..2126190,-p2@C1orf86
Hg19::chr1:2126192..2126218,-p1@C1orf86


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk mesenchyme1.51e-16143
trunk9.31e-16216
multilaminar epithelium1.03e-1382
cell layer7.11e-13312
dermomyotome1.12e-1270
unilaminar epithelium1.33e-12138
epithelium1.64e-12309
somite2.10e-1283
paraxial mesoderm2.10e-1283
presomitic mesoderm2.10e-1283
presumptive segmental plate2.10e-1283
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.10e-1283
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.10e-1283
vasculature2.55e-1279
vascular system2.55e-1279
mesenchyme5.45e-12238
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.45e-12238
epithelial tube9.44e-12118
organism subdivision1.91e-11365
multi-tissue structure2.32e-11347
skeletal muscle tissue2.59e-1161
striated muscle tissue2.59e-1161
myotome2.59e-1161
muscle tissue1.50e-1063
musculature1.50e-1063
musculature of body1.50e-1063
blood vessel4.76e-1060
epithelial tube open at both ends4.76e-1060
blood vasculature4.76e-1060
vascular cord4.76e-1060
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.69e-0984
vessel2.54e-0969
artery4.26e-0942
arterial blood vessel4.26e-0942
arterial system4.26e-0942
ectodermal placode2.71e-0729
subdivision of trunk3.29e-07113
parenchyma7.16e-0717


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.