Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4556

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:39, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4556_Cardiac_heart_Adipocyte_Smooth_left_Fibroblast_skeletal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:129204259..129204300,+p1@LAMA2
Hg19::chr6:129204301..129204323,+p2@LAMA2
Hg19::chr6:129204337..129204348,+p5@LAMA2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
non-terminally differentiated cell1.49e-18180
fibroblast1.16e-1375
muscle precursor cell1.39e-1057
myoblast1.39e-1057
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell1.39e-1057
contractile cell2.88e-0959
muscle cell2.91e-0954
fat cell1.99e-0815
electrically responsive cell2.89e-0860
electrically active cell2.89e-0860
skin fibroblast6.93e-0723
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.91e-28115
organism subdivision8.74e-21365
multi-cellular organism9.64e-15659
multi-tissue structure3.82e-14347
dermomyotome1.50e-1370
muscle tissue1.96e-1363
musculature1.96e-1363
musculature of body1.96e-1363
somite6.29e-1383
paraxial mesoderm6.29e-1383
presomitic mesoderm6.29e-1383
presumptive segmental plate6.29e-1383
trunk paraxial mesoderm6.29e-1383
presumptive paraxial mesoderm6.29e-1383
cell layer7.68e-13312
skeletal muscle tissue1.04e-1261
striated muscle tissue1.04e-1261
myotome1.04e-1261
primary circulatory organ1.27e-1227
regional part of brain2.00e-1259
epithelium4.02e-12309
anatomical cluster4.30e-12286
neural tube1.19e-1157
neural rod1.19e-1157
future spinal cord1.19e-1157
neural keel1.19e-1157
neural plate2.61e-1186
presumptive neural plate2.61e-1186
anatomical conduit1.03e-10241
central nervous system1.32e-1082
heart1.47e-1024
primitive heart tube1.47e-1024
primary heart field1.47e-1024
anterior lateral plate mesoderm1.47e-1024
heart tube1.47e-1024
heart primordium1.47e-1024
cardiac mesoderm1.47e-1024
cardiogenic plate1.47e-1024
heart rudiment1.47e-1024
brain2.79e-1069
future brain2.79e-1069
anatomical system3.03e-10625
neurectoderm3.20e-1090
multilaminar epithelium3.39e-1082
anatomical group4.63e-10626
regional part of nervous system2.14e-0994
nervous system2.14e-0994
tube4.25e-09194
anterior region of body6.06e-09129
craniocervical region6.06e-09129
head1.23e-08123
tissue1.34e-08787
anterior neural tube4.25e-0842
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm8.84e-0884
trunk mesenchyme9.91e-08143
regional part of forebrain1.36e-0741
forebrain1.36e-0741
future forebrain1.36e-0741
organ1.59e-07511
ectoderm-derived structure2.40e-07169
compound organ3.68e-0769
trunk4.83e-07216
ectoderm8.06e-07173
presumptive ectoderm8.06e-07173


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0281030824705626
NRF1#4899312.21027944771090.0005492172401020010.00473147730256644
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00667943190377201



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.