Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1851

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:32, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr9:41387933..41387975,+p@chr9:41387933..41387975
+
Mm9::chr9:41388018..41388050,+p@chr9:41388018..41388050
+
Mm9::chr9:41388053..41388074,+p@chr9:41388053..41388074
+
Mm9::chr9:41388786..41388800,+p1@ENSMUST00000098868
Mm9::chr9:50536026..50536113,-p1@Dixdc1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system7.48e-1773
ectoderm-derived structure1.68e-1695
ectoderm1.68e-1695
presumptive ectoderm1.68e-1695
nervous system1.96e-1675
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.92e-1492
neurectoderm3.76e-1464
neural plate3.76e-1464
presumptive neural plate3.76e-1464
ecto-epithelium6.19e-1473
regional part of nervous system1.61e-1254
neural tube7.30e-1252
neural rod7.30e-1252
future spinal cord7.30e-1252
neural keel7.30e-1252
pre-chordal neural plate7.80e-1149
brain1.40e-0947
future brain1.40e-0947
regional part of brain1.54e-0946
gray matter1.58e-0934
anterior neural tube2.98e-0940
regional part of forebrain7.99e-0939
forebrain7.99e-0939
future forebrain7.99e-0939
multi-cellular organism1.86e-08333
brain grey matter1.80e-0729
regional part of telencephalon1.80e-0729
telencephalon1.80e-0729
tissue4.60e-07349
embryo4.75e-07320


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}