Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3650

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:17, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3650_aorta_cervix_Wilms_small_bladder_choriocarcinoma_Preadipocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:47653178..47653241,+p1@NXPH3
Hg19::chr17:47653277..47653291,+p4@NXPH3
Hg19::chr17:47653471..47653492,+p2@NXPH3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.64e-34114
central nervous system3.81e-1481
neural tube4.06e-1456
neural rod4.06e-1456
future spinal cord4.06e-1456
neural keel4.06e-1456
regional part of nervous system8.68e-1453
regional part of brain8.68e-1453
brain4.30e-1368
future brain4.30e-1368
nervous system9.88e-1389
regional part of forebrain1.02e-1241
forebrain1.02e-1241
anterior neural tube1.02e-1241
future forebrain1.02e-1241
neocortex1.46e-1020
regional part of cerebral cortex2.60e-1022
telencephalon1.22e-0934
cerebral hemisphere1.75e-0932
cerebral cortex2.80e-0925
pallium2.80e-0925
brain grey matter3.36e-0934
gray matter3.36e-0934
neurectoderm9.16e-0986
neural plate1.34e-0882
presumptive neural plate1.34e-0882
regional part of telencephalon2.58e-0832
organ system subdivision1.05e-07223
pre-chordal neural plate7.13e-0761
cavity lining7.59e-0712
serous membrane7.59e-0712


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0189846283289516
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0279168007678263
CTCFL#140690319.74647435897440.0001298372005551160.00171581265200251
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324933571862598
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321732343247223
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00663419873060876
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00308776103804851
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140015581966018



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.