Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3711

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:20, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3711_CD19_CD4_immature_CD34_CD8_granulocyte_Peripheral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr18:2655220..2655234,+p@chr18:2655220..2655234
+
Hg19::chr4:140477910..140477922,-p10@SETD7
Hg19::chr4:140477928..140477990,-p4@SETD7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.49e-31136
nongranular leukocyte4.74e-28115
classical monocyte2.17e-2642
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.17e-2642
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell7.69e-26120
defensive cell4.24e-2348
phagocyte4.24e-2348
myeloid leukocyte2.51e-2272
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.32e-2261
hematopoietic stem cell6.23e-22168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell6.23e-22168
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.77e-2167
monopoietic cell1.32e-2059
monocyte1.32e-2059
monoblast1.32e-2059
promonocyte1.32e-2059
hematopoietic cell1.14e-19177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell9.56e-19161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell9.56e-19161
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.70e-1866
myeloid cell6.12e-12108
common myeloid progenitor6.12e-12108
stuff accumulating cell1.19e-0887
intermediate monocyte7.79e-089
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte7.79e-089
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.36e-0752
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell2.73e-076
lymphocyte4.86e-0753
common lymphoid progenitor4.86e-0753
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system8.58e-20108
hematopoietic system8.86e-2098
blood island8.86e-2098
immune system5.62e-1993
bone marrow8.95e-1876
bone element4.27e-1582
skeletal element3.61e-1290
skeletal system8.55e-10100


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0325100933990778
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321945286592958
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0294288770671755



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.