Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4162

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:43, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4162_Small_Gingival_bone_Mammary_epidermoid_nasal_oral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:192110104..192110170,+p1@MYO1B
Hg19::chr2:192110176..192110195,+p2@MYO1B
Hg19::chr2:192110199..192110210,+p3@MYO1B


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure1.15e-2199
organism subdivision1.59e-19264
skin of body2.90e-1441
integument1.01e-1346
integumental system1.01e-1346
trunk2.29e-13199
unilaminar epithelium8.95e-13148
multilaminar epithelium1.36e-1283
cell layer3.10e-12309
multi-tissue structure3.33e-12342
epithelium4.88e-12306
trunk mesenchyme3.52e-11122
multi-cellular organism5.96e-11656
endoderm-derived structure8.22e-11160
endoderm8.22e-11160
presumptive endoderm8.22e-11160
somite2.99e-1071
presomitic mesoderm2.99e-1071
presumptive segmental plate2.99e-1071
dermomyotome2.99e-1071
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.99e-1071
dense mesenchyme tissue3.05e-1073
paraxial mesoderm6.88e-1072
presumptive paraxial mesoderm6.88e-1072
mesenchyme7.54e-10160
entire embryonic mesenchyme7.54e-10160
digestive system1.26e-09145
digestive tract1.26e-09145
primitive gut1.26e-09145
anatomical cluster1.60e-09373
anatomical system2.05e-09624
anatomical group3.72e-09625
epithelial vesicle1.22e-0878
skeletal muscle tissue2.21e-0862
striated muscle tissue2.21e-0862
myotome2.21e-0862
muscle tissue5.60e-0864
musculature5.60e-0864
musculature of body5.60e-0864
primordium5.91e-08160
mucosa1.90e-0720
organ component layer2.17e-0766
head2.87e-0756
mouth5.28e-0729
stomodeum5.28e-0729
vasculature5.81e-0778
vascular system5.81e-0778
mouth mucosa6.95e-0713


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BHLHE40#8553344.87181354697741.10603738662898e-050.000285007250486415
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280148394418168
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326193004311678
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0323089969764013
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.00582356425883686
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.003920734178057
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0295153524536387
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00665626733704507
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0277428144450755
SMARCB1#6598212.16847718743830.008675002221921740.0329973615855805
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00309743076147305
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00544256049238542
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00614998345687167
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00616981639896337
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109646561941045



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.