Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:766

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:52, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:59362370..59362388,-p@chr10:59362370..59362388
-
Mm9::chr16:90284627..90284638,-p4@Scaf4
Mm9::chr18:3337307..3337326,-p14@Crem
Mm9::chr19:46578166..46578186,-p@chr19:46578166..46578186
-
Mm9::chr2:3392444..3392458,+p@chr2:3392444..3392458
+
Mm9::chr3:123211506..123211533,+p@chr3:123211506..123211533
+
Mm9::chr7:29594078..29594100,-p@chr7:29594078..29594100
-
Mm9::chr7:54175363..54175399,+p@chr7:54175363..54175399
+
Mm9::chr9:121766850..121766870,+p@chr9:121766850..121766870
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic cell6.83e-1232
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.83e-1232
hematopoietic stem cell6.83e-1232
angioblastic mesenchymal cell6.83e-1232
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.83e-1232
somatic stem cell1.01e-1091
multi fate stem cell1.01e-1091
somatic cell1.15e-10118
stem cell1.39e-1097
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.45e-1025
animal cell2.50e-09115
eukaryotic cell2.50e-09115
nucleate cell9.97e-0916
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.36e-0812
connective tissue cell4.55e-0846
mesenchymal cell4.55e-0846
T cell1.49e-0711
pro-T cell1.49e-0711
motile cell2.13e-0754
leukocyte6.80e-0717
nongranular leukocyte6.80e-0717
lymphocyte8.85e-0713
common lymphoid progenitor8.85e-0713
mature alpha-beta T cell9.87e-079
alpha-beta T cell9.87e-079
immature T cell9.87e-079
mature T cell9.87e-079
immature alpha-beta T cell9.87e-079

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
connective tissue4.55e-0846


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}