Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1535

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:03, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:80053037..80053074,-p1@Fam108a
Mm9::chr11:95896220..95896266,+p1@Snf8
Mm9::chr7:13623182..13623300,-p1@Ube2m
Mm9::chr7:5031816..5031900,+p1@Epn1
Mm9::chr8:73051636..73051665,+p1@Fkbp8


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
embryonic cell8.69e-0970
somatic cell1.87e-07118
epithelial cell2.27e-0725
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)3.32e-0723
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)3.32e-0723
animal cell6.04e-07115
eukaryotic cell6.04e-07115

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system1.98e-1254
neural tube2.21e-1152
neural rod2.21e-1152
future spinal cord2.21e-1152
neural keel2.21e-1152
central nervous system1.35e-1073
nervous system1.75e-1075
gray matter2.14e-1034
brain6.38e-1047
future brain6.38e-1047
regional part of brain7.82e-1046
brain grey matter2.62e-0929
regional part of telencephalon2.62e-0929
telencephalon2.62e-0929
anterior neural tube5.76e-0840
regional part of forebrain7.94e-0839
forebrain7.94e-0839
future forebrain7.94e-0839
mucosa4.14e-0715
cerebral cortex6.37e-0721
cerebral hemisphere6.37e-0721
pallium6.37e-0721


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}