Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2976

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:13, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr15:43701517..43701522,-p2@Tmem74
Mm9::chr1:179377578..179377589,+p@chr1:179377578..179377589
+
Mm9::chr3:17954258..17954267,+p7@Bhlhe22


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuron of cerebral cortex2.71e-106
neuron2.14e-0733
neuronal stem cell2.14e-0733
neuroblast2.14e-0733
electrically signaling cell2.14e-0733
electrically responsive cell6.18e-0739
electrically active cell6.18e-0739

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cerebral cortex1.69e-2021
cerebral hemisphere1.69e-2021
pallium1.69e-2021
brain grey matter3.86e-1829
regional part of telencephalon3.86e-1829
telencephalon3.86e-1829
gray matter7.50e-1734
regional part of cerebral cortex1.27e-1517
regional part of nervous system1.50e-1454
regional part of forebrain4.11e-1439
forebrain4.11e-1439
future forebrain4.11e-1439
nervous system9.37e-1475
anterior neural tube1.18e-1340
central nervous system4.58e-1373
regional part of brain5.38e-1346
brain1.27e-1247
future brain1.27e-1247
neural tube2.31e-1252
neural rod2.31e-1252
future spinal cord2.31e-1252
neural keel2.31e-1252
pre-chordal neural plate1.13e-1149
neurectoderm1.71e-1164
neural plate1.71e-1164
presumptive neural plate1.71e-1164
occipital lobe2.33e-1110
visual cortex2.33e-1110
neocortex2.33e-1110
ectoderm-derived structure1.51e-1095
ectoderm1.51e-1095
presumptive ectoderm1.51e-1095
ecto-epithelium1.89e-0973


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}