Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4860

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4860_Mast_Macrophage_Monocytederived_CD14_Melanocyte_testicular_Dendritic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chrX:153210060..153210071,-p3@RENBP
Hg19::chrX:153210073..153210106,-p1@RENBP
Hg19::chrX:153210107..153210140,-p2@RENBP


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid leukocyte2.63e-3472
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.41e-3166
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.81e-3167
myeloid cell3.96e-31108
common myeloid progenitor3.96e-31108
monopoietic cell2.65e-2859
monocyte2.65e-2859
monoblast2.65e-2859
promonocyte2.65e-2859
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.31e-2761
defensive cell3.37e-2648
phagocyte3.37e-2648
hematopoietic stem cell1.06e-25168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.06e-25168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell9.56e-25161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell9.56e-25161
leukocyte1.01e-24136
hematopoietic cell3.46e-24177
classical monocyte3.91e-2242
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.91e-2242
stuff accumulating cell2.05e-2187
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.14e-21120
nongranular leukocyte2.33e-19115
melanocyte9.69e-0710
melanoblast9.69e-0710
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system4.16e-32108
hematopoietic system5.73e-3098
blood island5.73e-3098
immune system1.29e-2993
bone marrow1.44e-2676
bone element7.91e-2282
adult organism1.52e-20114
skeletal element1.90e-1790
skeletal system6.97e-15100
lateral plate mesoderm2.00e-09203
neural tube1.52e-0756
neural rod1.52e-0756
future spinal cord1.52e-0756
neural keel1.52e-0756
regional part of nervous system7.52e-0753
regional part of brain7.52e-0753


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.0927
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.24048
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.904546
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.557638
MA0056.10
MA0057.14.3182
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.15.1975
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.11.70054
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.14.433
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.348055
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.21.62945
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.21.34467
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.11.76247
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.13.19905
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.22.70224
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.11.29138
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0191475561093866
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0324879766084161
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0322973884761319
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0109373833537322
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0128880410024726
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0191423393607516
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00423532511003565
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0110316080637726



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C4860&oldid=3071977"