Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:251

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:101144309..101144320,+p11@Mgat4c
Mm9::chr11:116094025..116094042,+p@chr11:116094025..116094042
+
Mm9::chr11:34214757..34214786,+p1@Fam196b
Mm9::chr11:83223222..83223229,+p3@Rasl10b
Mm9::chr11:83223238..83223251,+p4@Rasl10b
Mm9::chr12:118392499..118392529,+p@chr12:118392499..118392529
+
Mm9::chr12:35591550..35591565,-p4@Hdac9
Mm9::chr12:35591579..35591625,-p3@Hdac9
Mm9::chr12:89963414..89963443,+p5@LOC100505240
p6@Nrxn3
Mm9::chr12:89964039..89964051,+p@chr12:89964039..89964051
+
Mm9::chr15:48623701..48623720,-p2@Csmd3
Mm9::chr15:76351357..76351367,+p@chr15:76351357..76351367
+
Mm9::chr16:11984249..11984263,+p4@Shisa9
Mm9::chr16:96689316..96689332,+p1@Pcp4
Mm9::chr1:72583270..72583295,+p@chr1:72583270..72583295
+
Mm9::chr2:144353262..144353273,-p5@6330439K17Rik
Mm9::chr2:22477768..22477780,+p10@Gad2
Mm9::chr2:22478013..22478038,+p5@Gad2
Mm9::chr2:22478051..22478112,+p1@Gad2
Mm9::chr2:22478133..22478157,+p3@Gad2
Mm9::chr2:22478162..22478173,+p9@Gad2
Mm9::chr2:70400169..70400180,+p5@Gad1
Mm9::chr2:70400189..70400200,+p4@Gad1
Mm9::chr2:70400204..70400265,+p1@Gad1
Mm9::chr2:70401608..70401629,+p11@Gad1
Mm9::chr2:81893447..81893468,+p2@Zfp804a
Mm9::chr3:107989328..107989342,+p3@Amigo1
Mm9::chr4:150513630..150513686,-p4@Camta1
Mm9::chr5:108798425..108798450,-p@chr5:108798425..108798450
-
Mm9::chr6:119280686..119280712,-p3@Lrtm2
Mm9::chr6:55401822..55401866,+p2@Adcyap1r1
Mm9::chr7:116925052..116925068,-p1@Nrip3
Mm9::chr8:10249334..10249366,+p@chr8:10249334..10249366
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data




Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>



TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs