Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4685: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.207499882120391,

Latest revision as of 14:17, 17 September 2013


Full id: C4685_medial_frontal_amygdala_parietal_paracentral_occipital_Fibroblast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:35840659..35840671,+p3@SEPT7
Hg19::chr7:35840681..35840693,+p2@SEPT7
Hg19::chr7:35840743..35840750,+p4@SEPT7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast7.29e-0876
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.14e-15114
neural tube3.02e-1456
neural rod3.02e-1456
future spinal cord3.02e-1456
neural keel3.02e-1456
regional part of nervous system1.24e-1353
regional part of brain1.24e-1353
brain1.55e-1368
future brain1.55e-1368
telencephalon2.73e-1334
brain grey matter2.79e-1334
gray matter2.79e-1334
regional part of forebrain3.05e-1341
forebrain3.05e-1341
anterior neural tube3.05e-1341
future forebrain3.05e-1341
central nervous system4.91e-1381
cerebral hemisphere1.83e-1232
regional part of telencephalon2.67e-1232
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest7.15e-12132
nervous system9.97e-1189
regional part of cerebral cortex6.39e-0922
cerebral cortex1.51e-0825
pallium1.51e-0825
neural plate1.88e-0882
presumptive neural plate1.88e-0882
neocortex7.42e-0820
neurectoderm1.07e-0786
basal ganglion7.34e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis7.34e-079
aggregate regional part of brain7.34e-079
collection of basal ganglia7.34e-079
cerebral subcortex7.34e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.401049
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.758317
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.11.58389
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.904546
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.12.91799
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.12.91768
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.13.02823
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.752137
MA0146.10.348055
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.21.141
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.432958
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.11.43223
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.23.70709
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.22.70224
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BRCA1#672320.18423064322380.0001215704860271640.00164528961904768
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0191127893749825
CHD2#1106310.34402283411690.0009033701102746880.00662782374056749
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0327705117255826
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0324280968083927
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0322454037165704
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0464915933909016
ELK4#2005316.2356816584680.0002336043955745990.00256383033516347
ETS1#211339.728760922202340.001085840092584840.00765209537310848
FOSL1#8061339.7135797163731.59554825631833e-050.000372707368243414
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.0058417407307166
GTF2B#2959331.94382993432423.06634405746243e-050.000629785461194334
GTF2F1#2962312.73966087675770.0004835525047438590.00435961153685635
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0109198645199181
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0128724723168777
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0187421870268493
MEF2A#4205318.74323090964410.0001518243905622470.00195444194822266
MXI1#460139.96157162875930.001011470541259020.00723392260895371
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.029605923244872
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0270829641394564
NR3C1#2908314.9730233311730.0002978331194675480.00310185412485753
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173667762835649
POU2F2#545239.106124057742520.001324165192682130.00885708265393422
REST#597839.650028716128020.001112636247114590.00771290435499805
SMARCB1#6598318.25271578115740.000164397760679890.00204059160062361
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00545701277735427
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.00631964576761565
THAP1#55145331.36914460285133.23800758564397e-050.00064921150746222
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0331235780899877
ZBTB33#10009331.66472502998123.14815888737575e-050.000634853381036177
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0110128567224767



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.