Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1626: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0

Latest revision as of 11:48, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1626_pons_thalamus_amygdala_carcinosarcoma_diencephalon_Neural_medulla



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:22359292..22359301,+p9@SLC17A6
Hg19::chr11:22359398..22359428,+p5@SLC17A6
Hg19::chr11:22359432..22359478,+p4@SLC17A6
Hg19::chr11:22359501..22359513,+p7@SLC17A6
Hg19::chr11:22359910..22359937,+p1@SLC17A6


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
Merkel cell2.33e-082
neuronal stem cell4.15e-088
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube5.79e-7856
neural rod5.79e-7856
future spinal cord5.79e-7856
neural keel5.79e-7856
central nervous system3.29e-7581
regional part of nervous system2.29e-7353
regional part of brain2.29e-7353
nervous system6.67e-6789
neocortex1.88e-6620
regional part of cerebral cortex2.45e-6622
regional part of forebrain4.21e-6341
forebrain4.21e-6341
anterior neural tube4.21e-6341
future forebrain4.21e-6341
brain3.49e-5868
future brain3.49e-5868
cerebral cortex4.62e-5825
pallium4.62e-5825
brain grey matter1.42e-5534
gray matter1.42e-5534
telencephalon6.88e-5534
neural plate5.69e-5482
presumptive neural plate5.69e-5482
cerebral hemisphere1.04e-5332
neurectoderm4.43e-5186
regional part of telencephalon5.53e-4932
ecto-epithelium6.22e-46104
pre-chordal neural plate1.12e-4361
adult organism2.13e-36114
ectoderm-derived structure2.86e-36171
ectoderm2.86e-36171
presumptive ectoderm2.86e-36171
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.38e-34132
organ system subdivision4.47e-24223
brainstem5.92e-246
gyrus6.19e-226
temporal lobe4.48e-196
parietal lobe1.01e-185
occipital lobe1.83e-185
tube6.48e-17192
posterior neural tube1.13e-1515
chordal neural plate1.13e-1515
pons5.44e-133
medulla oblongata1.02e-123
myelencephalon1.02e-123
future myelencephalon1.02e-123
limbic system6.86e-125
frontal cortex7.18e-123
anatomical conduit7.20e-12240
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.28e-1112
hindbrain1.28e-1112
presumptive hindbrain1.28e-1112
anatomical cluster2.59e-11373
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.14e-1013
epithelium9.57e-10306
cell layer1.45e-09309
diencephalon1.68e-097
future diencephalon1.68e-097
locus ceruleus4.11e-092
brainstem nucleus4.11e-092
hindbrain nucleus4.11e-092
pituitary gland6.85e-092
amygdala1.01e-082
middle frontal gyrus1.13e-082
middle temporal gyrus1.27e-082
organ part2.99e-08218
meninx6.09e-082
membrane organ6.09e-082
meningeal cluster6.09e-082


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.136928
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.0418333
MA0017.10.496101
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.10.195817
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.10.0853006
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.189508
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.10.291022
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.10.247962
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.10.00220137
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.10.132006
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.556637
MA0091.10.629594
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.10.442769
MA0105.10.175503
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.10.372523
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.994489
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.10.504689
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.10.743749
MA0139.10.277033
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.10.520334
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.10.797437
MA0144.10.938075
MA0145.10.143698
MA0146.10.0359558
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.10.653474
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.20.311551
MA0138.24.65117
MA0002.20.30855
MA0137.20.47779
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.21.80892
MA0112.20.839774
MA0065.20.146576
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.172764
MA0155.10.130813
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.386729
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.21472
MA0163.10.0439995
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.20.456437
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.20.000396307
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.914277
MA0259.11.02361
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HDAC2#3066410.7324961893010.0001450965797478750.00188526271364621
REST#597847.720022972902420.0005286363773650570.00457076369034103
SIN3A#2594244.327107781452110.004977052855762880.0232353682536775
ZNF143#7702410.80070124178230.0001415223430863190.00184386876117665



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.