Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4121: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Coexpression_clusters |full_id=C4121_hairy_globus_thalamus_substantia_cord_skeletal_corpus |id=C4121 }}")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
|full_id=C4121_hairy_globus_thalamus_substantia_cord_skeletal_corpus
|full_id=C4121_hairy_globus_thalamus_substantia_cord_skeletal_corpus
|id=C4121
|id=C4121
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0000542!1.29e-08!53;CL:0000051!1.29e-08!53;CL:0000945!4.89e-08!24;CL:0000826!4.89e-08!24;CL:0000838!5.19e-08!52
|ontology_enrichment_disease=
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=UBERON:0007023!1.82e-39!115;UBERON:0001049!4.94e-30!57;UBERON:0005068!4.94e-30!57;UBERON:0006241!4.94e-30!57;UBERON:0007135!4.94e-30!57;UBERON:0002616!1.60e-26!59;UBERON:0001893!3.89e-26!34;UBERON:0002780!4.37e-26!41;UBERON:0001890!4.37e-26!41;UBERON:0006240!4.37e-26!41;UBERON:0002020!4.80e-26!34;UBERON:0003528!4.80e-26!34;UBERON:0003080!3.23e-25!42;UBERON:0002791!6.27e-25!33;UBERON:0000955!2.36e-24!69;UBERON:0006238!2.36e-24!69;UBERON:0001869!1.76e-23!32;UBERON:0001017!3.28e-23!82;UBERON:0005743!1.73e-22!86;UBERON:0000073!3.69e-20!94;UBERON:0001016!3.69e-20!94;UBERON:0003075!2.11e-19!86;UBERON:0007284!2.11e-19!86;UBERON:0002619!5.66e-18!22;UBERON:0002346!6.44e-18!90;UBERON:0001950!1.54e-15!20;UBERON:0003056!3.42e-15!61;UBERON:0000956!3.57e-15!25;UBERON:0000203!3.57e-15!25;UBERON:0002308!1.67e-13!9;UBERON:0000125!1.67e-13!9;UBERON:0000153!4.94e-13!129;UBERON:0007811!4.94e-13!129;UBERON:0000033!1.04e-12!123;UBERON:0009663!5.95e-11!7;UBERON:0002420!1.11e-10!9;UBERON:0007245!1.11e-10!9;UBERON:0010009!1.11e-10!9;UBERON:0010011!1.11e-10!9;UBERON:0000454!1.11e-10!9;UBERON:0000200!2.68e-09!6;UBERON:0004121!3.88e-08!169;UBERON:0000924!1.19e-07!173;UBERON:0006601!1.19e-07!173;UBERON:0002298!8.59e-07!8
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:44, 21 May 2012


Full id: C4121_hairy_globus_thalamus_substantia_cord_skeletal_corpus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:127839576..127839585,-p17@BIN1
Hg19::chr2:127839604..127839620,-p12@BIN1
Hg19::chr2:127839633..127839647,-p10@BIN1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphocyte1.29e-0853
common lymphoid progenitor1.29e-0853
lymphocyte of B lineage4.89e-0824
pro-B cell4.89e-0824
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.19e-0852
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.82e-39115
neural tube4.94e-3057
neural rod4.94e-3057
future spinal cord4.94e-3057
neural keel4.94e-3057
regional part of brain1.60e-2659
telencephalon3.89e-2634
regional part of forebrain4.37e-2641
forebrain4.37e-2641
future forebrain4.37e-2641
gray matter4.80e-2634
brain grey matter4.80e-2634
anterior neural tube3.23e-2542
regional part of telencephalon6.27e-2533
brain2.36e-2469
future brain2.36e-2469
cerebral hemisphere1.76e-2332
central nervous system3.28e-2382
regional part of nervous system3.69e-2094
nervous system3.69e-2094
neural plate2.11e-1986
presumptive neural plate2.11e-1986
regional part of cerebral cortex5.66e-1822
neurectoderm6.44e-1890
neocortex1.54e-1520
pre-chordal neural plate3.42e-1561
cerebral cortex3.57e-1525
pallium3.57e-1525
nucleus of brain1.67e-139
neural nucleus1.67e-139
anterior region of body4.94e-13129
craniocervical region4.94e-13129
head1.04e-12123
telencephalic nucleus5.95e-117
basal ganglion1.11e-109
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.11e-109
aggregate regional part of brain1.11e-109
collection of basal ganglia1.11e-109
cerebral subcortex1.11e-109
gyrus2.68e-096
ectoderm-derived structure3.88e-08169
ectoderm1.19e-07173
presumptive ectoderm1.19e-07173
brainstem8.59e-078


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.