Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4652

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:51, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4652_CD14_neuroectodermal_CD8_Neutrophils_CD4_Natural_anaplastic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:130604898..130604901,-p@chr7:130604898..130604901
-
Hg19::chr7:130623634..130623638,-p@chr7:130623634..130623638
-
Hg19::chr7:130625196..130625211,-p@chr7:130625196..130625211
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte1.26e-34140
nongranular leukocyte6.66e-32119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.72e-28124
hematopoietic stem cell1.33e-24172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.33e-24172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell7.58e-24165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell7.58e-24165
hematopoietic cell2.42e-22182
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.99e-1942
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.76e-1752
classical monocyte7.26e-1745
lymphocyte8.29e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor8.29e-1753
myeloid leukocyte3.77e-1676
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor8.32e-1465
monopoietic cell9.97e-1463
monocyte9.97e-1463
monoblast9.97e-1463
promonocyte9.97e-1463
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.88e-1371
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.08e-1270
myeloid cell2.63e-09112
common myeloid progenitor2.63e-09112
mature alpha-beta T cell1.08e-0818
alpha-beta T cell1.08e-0818
immature T cell1.08e-0818
mature T cell1.08e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell1.08e-0818
lymphocyte of B lineage2.03e-0824
pro-B cell2.03e-0824
T cell4.35e-0825
pro-T cell4.35e-0825
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system5.43e-16102
blood island5.43e-16102
adult organism1.16e-14115
hemolymphoid system5.48e-14112
bone marrow6.75e-1280
bone element4.57e-1186
neural tube1.45e-0857
neural rod1.45e-0857
future spinal cord1.45e-0857
neural keel1.45e-0857
regional part of forebrain5.11e-0841
forebrain5.11e-0841
future forebrain5.11e-0841
skeletal element5.49e-08101
skeletal system5.49e-08101
anterior neural tube5.57e-0842
immune system2.42e-07115
gray matter4.91e-0734
brain grey matter4.91e-0734
regional part of brain7.43e-0759


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.