Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1320

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:09, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1320_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_CD14_Natural_Peripheral_Basophils_CD8



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:70849864..70849882,-p@chr10:70849864..70849882
-
Hg19::chr12:19593186..19593212,-p@chr12:19593186..19593212
-
Hg19::chr15:79165517..79165535,-p@chr15:79165517..79165535
-
Hg19::chr17:36981699..36981722,+p2@MIR4727
Hg19::chr19:13957456..13957468,-p@chr19:13957456..13957468
-
Hg19::chrX:70331529..70331558,+p@chrX:70331529..70331558
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte9.46e-47140
hematopoietic stem cell8.22e-46172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell8.22e-46172
hematopoietic cell3.82e-44182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.58e-42165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.58e-42165
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.54e-36124
nongranular leukocyte1.12e-35119
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.75e-2542
classical monocyte3.11e-2545
myeloid cell5.86e-23112
common myeloid progenitor5.86e-23112
myeloid leukocyte7.49e-2376
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.65e-1971
lymphocyte1.14e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor1.14e-1753
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.44e-1770
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.64e-1752
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.78e-1765
monopoietic cell5.02e-1663
monocyte5.02e-1663
monoblast5.02e-1663
promonocyte5.02e-1663
mesenchymal cell4.65e-13358
connective tissue cell2.60e-12365
motile cell1.07e-11390
mature alpha-beta T cell7.93e-0918
alpha-beta T cell7.93e-0918
immature T cell7.93e-0918
mature T cell7.93e-0918
immature alpha-beta T cell7.93e-0918
T cell2.02e-0825
pro-T cell2.02e-0825
lymphocyte of B lineage2.28e-0824
pro-B cell2.28e-0824
stem cell5.57e-07444
granulocyte7.77e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.47e-23102
blood island1.47e-23102
hemolymphoid system4.61e-20112
bone marrow3.44e-1780
bone element1.33e-1586
immune system3.21e-12115
connective tissue2.27e-11375
skeletal element4.31e-10101
skeletal system4.31e-10101
blood3.69e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid3.69e-0715
organism substance3.69e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.